Example:
2 - I deleted this video immediately after a partial watching.
3 - I couldn't finish watching it the first time. Why would I want to watch it again?
These 2 description fields seem to indicate that it's okay to give a review even when you've not watched the entire video. I'm not sure what people think of this, but I feel it's is a really bad/unfair way of reviewing a video. I think a good minimum requirement to give a review is that the video being reviewed is actually watched, at least once!.
On the whole, the descriptions seemed to promote a bell curve distribution, perhaps deliberately? Also using a fixed period of time to indicate score currently seem a little rigid/inconsistent too. I think instead of using the frequency of re-watching, perhaps the enjoyment of re-watching would be a better reference?
A possible alternative suggestion.....?
10 - This is one of my all-time favorites to re-watch. A classic.
9 - I often get urges to re-watch the video. Worthy re-watching.
8 - I'll enjoy watching it again.
7 - I sure don't mind re-watching this video once in a while.
6 - I’ll re-watch it again, but not very often
5 - I have no urge to watch the video again, but I wouldn't suffer when I do.
4 - Watching it again will test my patience. I’ll probably not watch it again.
3 - I had trouble sitting through it. I will probably not keep the video.
2 - Very difficult to watch, I'm deleting the video shortly after this.
1 - I only managed to painfully watch it all in a couple of sittings; I immediately purged it from my computer after the review.
Hmm well, for what it's worth.
