TwilightChrono wrote:This went through a grand total of 31 beta tests.
CodeZTM wrote:Text wise, l33tmeat would be a good source to ask on this one. I personally thought it was a fun additional aspect, but I might be wrong in this case. I'm definitely not the authority on text here. XD
And just make the video random as all hell. -TwilightChrono
snapxynith wrote:And just make the video random as all hell. -TwilightChrono
You did make it random. This is our complaint.
If you are going to make a text experiment, do that. If you want a multi-source amv, do this.
Instead what you made was six videos in the space of one. It is indeed random but if you wanted that you could put up white noise for three minutes as that would be as random as it gets. Wanting to do a text experiment without a goal is like typing j;kdasjdfa; and calling it a book. Sure you could do that but would people care about the book?
Pick what you want the text to do and pick what you want your editing to convey. If any of your video conveys something learn from the pieces that worked and build from that. As it is now, you probably should strip it down and rebuild one of the concepts.
Oh, and if you're bad at text, we all start that way. You do not get better at text by avoiding the experimentation. So start actually experimenting with text instead of footage overlays of someone else's work.
Kudos on the attempt and keep trying, we'll all look forward to your next video.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests