MOV or AVI
- The14thGOD
- Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 1:12 pm
- Location: Everywhere
- Contact:
MOV or AVI
I sense a debate here hehe.
I was wondering, what is more generally used? I thought it was .mov files, and started using .mov for my video footage (exporting and transfering from computer to computer and program to program). Some dont think this is practical and I was wondering what you guys though.
So far I havn't really had any problems with mov files but tend to get problems with avi clips. Even if the codec is huffyuv.
Of course this might just mean I'm doing something wrong ^_^. It seems switching back and fourth from Final Cut Pro (at school) and Premiere Pro / After Effects(my home computer) works better if the footage is mov. This is like after i get the main edits done, like the footage generally is from a dvd so I use the avs method.
If anyone happens to know pros/cons that would be cool.
Thanks for any input.
The14thGOD
I was wondering, what is more generally used? I thought it was .mov files, and started using .mov for my video footage (exporting and transfering from computer to computer and program to program). Some dont think this is practical and I was wondering what you guys though.
So far I havn't really had any problems with mov files but tend to get problems with avi clips. Even if the codec is huffyuv.
Of course this might just mean I'm doing something wrong ^_^. It seems switching back and fourth from Final Cut Pro (at school) and Premiere Pro / After Effects(my home computer) works better if the footage is mov. This is like after i get the main edits done, like the footage generally is from a dvd so I use the avs method.
If anyone happens to know pros/cons that would be cool.
Thanks for any input.
The14thGOD
http://the14thgod.com
A man is only blind to the world, if he does not understand it.
A man is only blind to the world, if he does not understand it.
- Scintilla
- (for EXTREME)
- Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2003 8:47 pm
- Status: Quo
- Location: New Jersey
- Contact:
- Shazzy
- Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2004 8:15 pm
- Location: The Universe
- Contact:
Well, I personally find MOV less problematic for what you're describing... Final Cut to Premiere and back. There are lot more MOVs floating around in the professional video industry than the AMV community in general. Everyone around here uses AVI containers, seems like..
AMV guides for Mac users
DOWNLOAD THIS AMV
DOWNLOAD THIS AMV
Quarter-life crisis: a sense that everyone is, somehow, doing better than you.
- Willen
- Now in Hi-Def!
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 1:50 am
- Status: Melancholy
- Location: SOS-Dan HQ
-
trythil
- is
- Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2002 5:54 am
- Status: N͋̀͒̆ͣ͋ͤ̍ͮ͌ͭ̔̊͒ͧ̿
- Location: N????????????????
AVIs (there's no "Video for Windows" for anything except, well, Windows) aren't really that common on a Linux box unless you've got video compressed for online distribution in them.Scintilla wrote:I believe it depends on your platform.
The impression that I get is that QuickTime is the dominant format on Apples, whereas Video for Windows is most common on IBM-compatibles (including those that run Linux). Could be mistaken.
There's a lot of tools built to handle image sequences, and libquicktime support (QuickTime container read/write library) is present in a fair number of video tools.
- The14thGOD
- Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 1:12 pm
- Location: Everywhere
- Contact:
Another question, so for distributing my AMV's would you suggest the AVI's then? I used to hate the mov format, rather quicktime, but now it seems to be the better, to me and through my experience. I'd assume that quicktime is found on most computers but idk for sure. I'm just wondering so I know what would be best to distribute mine as.
Thanks a ton,
The14thGOD
Thanks a ton,
The14thGOD
http://the14thgod.com
A man is only blind to the world, if he does not understand it.
A man is only blind to the world, if he does not understand it.
- Keeper of Hellfire
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 6:13 am
- Location: Germany
- BauziOLD
- Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 5:16 am
- Location: Austria (uhm the other country without kangaroos^^)
- Contact:
Yes I also really don´t like Quicktime and I have problems with .mov, but it seams that the more the Quicktime player is damaged and he screws a few things. If I can, I simply avoid .movThe14thGOD wrote:Another question, so for distributing my AMV's would you suggest the AVI's then? I used to hate the mov format, rather quicktime,
I´m not so happy with the format, but I have to say that I didn´t really tried and got my focus on avi and h264
- Qyot27
- Surreptitious fluffy bunny
- Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 12:08 pm
- Status: Creepin' between the bullfrogs
- Location: St. Pete, FL
- Contact:
I don't know how this goes in Europe, but as far as I can remember, Quicktime has always come already installed in the PCs we've bought. It's all up to the vendor, I assume.Keeper of Hellfire wrote:Over 90% of all PC run on a Windows version and can't play MOV-files out of the box. So I guess AVI is the better choice in the moment, but in the near future it will be MP4 with h.264 codec since it's a platform independent standard.
- Willen
- Now in Hi-Def!
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 1:50 am
- Status: Melancholy
- Location: SOS-Dan HQ
For distro, AVI since most people that can watch fansubs should be able to play the video. And the playback guides here do a good job explaining how to play these AVI files.
MP4 is gaining acceptance. And, if I can figure out what exact settings I need to use for a H.264+AAC MP4 that will be compatible with my PS3 directly, I'm all on that format.
MP4 is gaining acceptance. And, if I can figure out what exact settings I need to use for a H.264+AAC MP4 that will be compatible with my PS3 directly, I'm all on that format.








