Mission: Impossible? Or just improbable?
- The Non-Professional
- Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2001 9:21 pm
- Location: Maybe on earth, maybe in the future
Oh forgot to mention this, Im willing to host the video when its done, just give me the very big Xvid or DivX or whatever version of it. and once this is finsihed, um this is just a suggetion but a DVD version (probably VCD tho or whatever) should be sent out to people who order it since dannywillsion said this was like a christmas present to the entire animemusicvideos.org community

- klinky
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2001 12:23 am
- Location: Cookie College...
- Contact:
- Dannywilson
- Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2002 5:36 am
- Location: In love with Dr. Girlfriend
Ok, apparently my hosting company doesn't cut me off or charge me extra for exceeding my bandwidth limits, so I'll host the 80 mb file for however long it needs to be hosted.
"in the morning when i have wood..i like to walk around my house and bump random shit with it.... " -Random comment on grouphug.us
- Ashyukun
- Medicinal Leech
- Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 12:53 pm
- Location: KY
- Contact:
- The Non-Professional
- Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2001 9:21 pm
- Location: Maybe on earth, maybe in the future
- RadicalEd0
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2002 2:58 pm
uhh.. another explanation:
DVD is 720x480 because they are meant to be viewed on a TV. Since pixels on a TV are not square like a computer monitor but taller than they are wide (10:11) the resolution of 704(+16 overscan borders)x480 is true 4:3. Of course, when the pixels are square true 4:3 is 640x480. However, Firestorm's idea is a good one for the reasons of:
1. if we put the thing on DVD it will be full res and wont have to be upsampled from 640 to 720
2. its a higher resolution.
3. less avisynth processing
The complete project could always be resized to 640x480 for web encoding.
Anyway, its too late now, just a lesson for the future. Its no big deal though.
DVD is 720x480 because they are meant to be viewed on a TV. Since pixels on a TV are not square like a computer monitor but taller than they are wide (10:11) the resolution of 704(+16 overscan borders)x480 is true 4:3. Of course, when the pixels are square true 4:3 is 640x480. However, Firestorm's idea is a good one for the reasons of:
1. if we put the thing on DVD it will be full res and wont have to be upsampled from 640 to 720
2. its a higher resolution.
3. less avisynth processing
The complete project could always be resized to 640x480 for web encoding.
Anyway, its too late now, just a lesson for the future. Its no big deal though.
NMEAMV: PENIS
NMEAMV: IN
NMEAMV: YO
NMEAMV: MIXED
NMEAMV: DRINK
NMEAMV: IN
NMEAMV: YO
NMEAMV: MIXED
NMEAMV: DRINK
- The Non-Professional
- Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2001 9:21 pm
- Location: Maybe on earth, maybe in the future
- klinky
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2001 12:23 am
- Location: Cookie College...
- Contact:
Super >_< OMG that makes sense. Well I was still correct, I just didn't have the right idea :pRadicalEd0 wrote:uhh.. another explanation:
DVD is 720x480 because they are meant to be viewed on a TV. Since pixels on a TV are not square like a computer monitor but taller than they are wide (10:11) the resolution of 704(+16 overscan borders)x480 is true 4:3. Of course, when the pixels are square true 4:3 is 640x480. However, Firestorm's idea is a good one for the reasons of:
1. if we put the thing on DVD it will be full res and wont have to be upsampled from 640 to 720
2. its a higher resolution.
3. less avisynth processing
The complete project could always be resized to 640x480 for web encoding.
Anyway, its too late now, just a lesson for the future. Its no big deal though.
Okay now I know video boy Radical...
I was thinking over this and I decided against doing anything that required ALOT of work. Quick and easy. Especially with the short deadline and notice on this project. I don't think it would be fun to find out, that twelve people didn't edit @ 23.976 properly, or they cropped the edges off their video, or something whack like that.
Who the hell is going to burn this DVD? Do any of you have a DVD-burner, and media @ $5 a pop is pricey. We could still do a SVCD MPEG2 and not lose really any kwality since it'd be down sampled to 480x480. ^_^ What do you think of dem apples? Of course well we area going @ straight 24fps, so that may not conform with SVCD spec
~klinky
- Chaos Angel
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2002 11:34 am
- Location: Vidderating
- Contact:
- klinky
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2001 12:23 am
- Location: Cookie College...
- Contact:
