Your Typical Compression

Locked
User avatar
RamonesFan2020204
Joined: Wed May 30, 2001 1:18 pm
Org Profile

Post by RamonesFan2020204 » Tue May 02, 2006 10:11 am

doomer000 wrote:
greenjinjo wrote:
doomer000 wrote:I prefer RM or WMV i hate huge files.
Are... you.... serious....?

RM makes baby Koop cry :cry:
Ya whats wrong with getting good quality sound and video in under 20 MB!!! :twisted:
Nothing's wrong at all! Besides, I can't understand why people would prefer a lower resolution and a larger file size.
Image
Now available in MP4 format for the iPod Video.

User avatar
DJ_Izumi
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2001 8:29 am
Location: Canada
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by DJ_Izumi » Tue May 02, 2006 11:51 am

Oh my freaking god.... What in the hell is wrong with you people!? Thinking RM gets you 'higher resolution and lower file size'?

I sware, we should ban you from the site... If only we were Nazi's like that! T_T
Image

User avatar
Chibi war
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 6:19 am
Location: The almigthy Netherlands.
Org Profile

Post by Chibi war » Tue May 02, 2006 11:57 am

Darn, if there's one thing I hate then it's WMV... If there's a second thing I hate, and let me tell you, there is, then it's RM :o
Bad quality, fast movement's get compressed really bad... :o I usually avoid any AMV here that's smaller then 40/50Mb...

User avatar
RamonesFan2020204
Joined: Wed May 30, 2001 1:18 pm
Org Profile

Post by RamonesFan2020204 » Tue May 02, 2006 12:02 pm

BTW, Doomer, I added you to my AOL Buddy List. 8-)
Image
Now available in MP4 format for the iPod Video.

User avatar
DJ_Izumi
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2001 8:29 am
Location: Canada
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by DJ_Izumi » Tue May 02, 2006 12:03 pm

AN AXIS OF STUPID, THREATENS OUR NATIONZ.
Image

User avatar
angelx03
Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2003 7:13 pm
Location: In school, Rochester NY mainly RIT; in home, Tampa, FL
Org Profile

Post by angelx03 » Tue May 02, 2006 12:17 pm

DJ_Izumi wrote:AN AXIS OF STUPID, THREATENS OUR NATIONZ.
It's there to spite the people who know what they're doing. Of course it's not like their videos are looking any better. :roll:
ImageImage
Image

User avatar
Chibi war
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 6:19 am
Location: The almigthy Netherlands.
Org Profile

Post by Chibi war » Tue May 02, 2006 12:22 pm

angelx03 wrote:
DJ_Izumi wrote:AN AXIS OF STUPID, THREATENS OUR NATIONZ.
It's there to spite the people who know what they're doing. Of course it's not like their videos are looking any better. :roll:
Of course they're better, they use dragonballZ and have linkin park, or even better, Naruto~! :o Always better then any AMV ever will be. [/sarcasm]

User avatar
Streicher
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2003 11:48 am
Org Profile

Post by Streicher » Tue May 02, 2006 1:25 pm

Chibi war wrote:I usually avoid any AMV here that's smaller then 40/50Mb...
Sorry, but its very possible to get good looking results in that filerange if the song is around 3 minutes.

I'm sorry that you think a good looking amv needs to be XBOX HUEG. ,_,

I personally hate big sized amvs. There have to be some really good reasons to distribute them in the 70+ MB range. For example very difficult to compress source, lots of very fine text/effects or a very long song. I've seen plenty of amvs where the filesize just wasnt justified at all. For me its a sign of lazyness. ._.

When hunting for amvs, an amv in wmv or an (unjustified) 70+ size must really interest me to get downloaded.
RM will probably never have a chance. There is absolutely no excuse to use that fugly codec.
WMV9 can look very good. But it eats up more resources then a smaller and similar looking h.264 encode.
Image

User avatar
Chibi war
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 6:19 am
Location: The almigthy Netherlands.
Org Profile

Post by Chibi war » Tue May 02, 2006 1:37 pm

I usually avoid any AMV here that's smaller then 40/50Mb...
Counting on the fact they have an average length, but It's kind of hard to make a chart right now with filesizes and lenghts compared.. ^^'

User avatar
DJ_Izumi
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2001 8:29 am
Location: Canada
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by DJ_Izumi » Tue May 02, 2006 5:53 pm

Since the community will likely gravitate towards h.264 we'll face a problem once (And, patheticly, still occasioanlly) seen with DivX and XviD encodes. People with absolutely no clue how to play them.

Even in 2006 I've occasionally heard "I get sound but there's no video." when someone tries to playback an XviD or DivX video. H.264 in mp4 or MKV is only going to make this situation worse.

What suggestions to people have to combat this? Would an Org Codec Pack be a decent idea or would that likely just conflict with other, already effective packs like the CCCP? Should the org endorse CCCP?
Image

Locked

Return to “Video & Audio Help”