Problem with the Star Rating System
- Beowulf
- Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 9:41 pm
- Location: in the art house
- Contact:
- thistledown
- Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2002 3:39 am
- Location: Here
- Contact:
If it's an avi or mpeg, and I can't play it for some reason, I'll rate it based of the description they gave in the write-up. Most of the time, a 3.
If it's RM or quicktime, I do pretty much the same thing, then subtract a point or two for using those systems.
If it's RM or quicktime, I do pretty much the same thing, then subtract a point or two for using those systems.
The sword, it thirsts to drink of man,
The sword at last must win,
Today is gone, and yesterday,
Must echo in the wind.
The sword at last must win,
Today is gone, and yesterday,
Must echo in the wind.
-
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 12:08 am
- Location: Illinois
- Contact:
Range
Regarding the star system;
I've gotten the following star rankings so far (doing reverse averaging. I wish they'd give you a bar graph, but *shrugs*)
4, 3, 3, 3, 1, 2, 1
Such a wide spread seems to indicate a technical problem, but I'm not sure what. It doesn't seem like my video would not be worth a 1 under any circumstance, even if someone didn't actually like it.
Is someone spamming the system? It seems my ratings always get better after the first week or so ( presumably when people search for it for it's content rather than as a new release? ) Any thoughts?
I've gotten the following star rankings so far (doing reverse averaging. I wish they'd give you a bar graph, but *shrugs*)
4, 3, 3, 3, 1, 2, 1
Such a wide spread seems to indicate a technical problem, but I'm not sure what. It doesn't seem like my video would not be worth a 1 under any circumstance, even if someone didn't actually like it.
Is someone spamming the system? It seems my ratings always get better after the first week or so ( presumably when people search for it for it's content rather than as a new release? ) Any thoughts?
Indecision is the basis of flexibility
- badmartialarts
- Bad Martial Artist
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 5:31 am
- Location: In ur Kitchen Stadium, eatin ur peppurz
- Castor Troy
- Ryan Molina, A.C.E
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2001 8:45 pm
- Status: Retired from AMVs
- Location: California
- Contact:
- MadNavigator
- Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2004 3:41 pm
- Location: Hanamaru Crackerbox
- Contact:
- l2urouni
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 8:47 pm
- Location: Kali-for-ni-A
Re: Range
hmm...maybe people have different opinions or already judge the video before they even watch it. it sucks but what can we do?wiserd wrote:Regarding the star system;
I've gotten the following star rankings so far (doing reverse averaging. I wish they'd give you a bar graph, but *shrugs*)
4, 3, 3, 3, 1, 2, 1
Such a wide spread seems to indicate a technical problem, but I'm not sure what. It doesn't seem like my video would not be worth a 1 under any circumstance, even if someone didn't actually like it.
Is someone spamming the system? It seems my ratings always get better after the first week or so ( presumably when people search for it for it's content rather than as a new release? ) Any thoughts?
anyhow...how do u check what stars people give you? i can only find the number of stars and the average of them.
-
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 12:08 am
- Location: Illinois
- Contact:
Reverse averaging
I checked the stars people were giving me by recording each as they came, noting the change in my average, and calculating a reverse average. You have to sit by the computer and count them. One. at. a. time.
But I was online for the first day after I posted my video, so I figured I'd give it a try.
There isn't a way to check the actual stars, like, conveniently. Would be nice.

There isn't a way to check the actual stars, like, conveniently. Would be nice.
Indecision is the basis of flexibility
- )v(ajin Koji
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2003 11:22 am
- Location: Essex, U.K.
- Contact: