Yes, typo there.Clara Yuri Asaki wrote:Did you mean Yuri is for guys?
Oh goody, a forum dedicated to yuri, where 80% of the users say they're female when they arn't. Yum, yum, a bunch of lesbian lusting online posers going 'OMG PRETEEN LEXBIANS h0t!!!'.Clara Yuri Asaki wrote:But still, there are PLENTY of meaningful Shoujo-Ai/Yuri pics out there. I have a HUGE collection of them on my forum.
DJ_Izumi wrote:Oh goody, a forum dedicated to yuri, where 80% of the users say they're female when they arn't. Yum, yum, a bunch of lesbian lusting online posers going 'OMG PRETEEN LEXBIANS h0t!!!'.
Ok, that was just plain out unnecessary! How dare you insult the nice people of my forum! And without even ever looking at it! Really... stooping to sudden, unprovoked, and harsh insulting about something you don't even know about in the middle of a fairly peaceful dicussion... Please, just don't talk about my forum anymore until you have actually seen it. And people actually wonder why I stopped visting AMV.org.... I don't have to, it's a common internet character archetype. You can catagorize most people on the internet into about 10 different possable catagories. And 'posers' are one of those types. I honestly estimate that at least 40% (most likely more, but I feel safer with a lower number) of the girls in an anime related comunity are really make, double that statistic for yuri comunities. (Ironicly, the yaoi comunities have very few posers It's like er... what's it's place... Shoujoai.com. I went digging threw there, you can fairly easily tell who is really what based on vocabulary, images, emoticons and similar things that make up ones 'internet dialect'.Clara Yuri Asaki wrote:Ok, that was just plain out unnecessary! How dare you insult the nice people of my forum! And without even ever looking at it!
Ok, well then, you still wouldn't know because you haven't seen my forum. And don't let those photos of us in our Member's Pics thread fool you. Those are totally fake.DJ_Izumi wrote:I don't have to, it's a common internet character archetype. You can catagorize most people on the internet into about 10 different possable catagories.
......
you can fairly easily tell who is really what based on vocabulary, images, emoticons and similar things that make up ones 'internet dialect'.
That's about the whole archetyping, etc. - seems like a reference to Jung, though a bit flat.DJ_Izumi wrote:...Elaborate.Otohiko wrote:Cut the pseudo-Jungian crap DJ.
What? I look just like my Avatar...which is why I keep changing it. Like, 5 times.DJ_Izumi wrote:Wow... people using pics online that arn't really themselves? SHOCKING! [/sarcasm]
:\
