Otakon 2003: Sizing up the Competition...

Announcement & discussion of Anime Music Video contests
Forum rules
Coordinators who fail to maintain necessary communication with entrants, or provide timely updates on results may be barred from announcing future events.
Locked
User avatar
Vlad G Pohnert
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2001 2:29 pm
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Org Profile

Post by Vlad G Pohnert » Wed Jun 18, 2003 8:51 pm

Well... One thing is for sure, Big contest will not suffer for this if creators start to withdraw for winning unexpectedly somwwhere elese, but the small cons will SUFFER if this starts to happen on a bigger scale....

Vlad
BaHaRa wrote:
iserlohn wrote:Hot damn. Am I the only one who will be crying for joy if their video makes the final cut?

and re: Yatta....if the creator's decnt they'll contact Matt and change their submission to non-competing. It'll still get shown once or twice on the big screen, people can laugh, and the ignorant can bitch about it being screwed out of the contest later. I consider it a troll at this point (like AD said in the Portcon thread, it's had its 15 minutes of fame....three times), someone else on this coast deserves a chance.

we have sent emails and withdrawn from the competing section of fanime and some others just now. we all very much wish to compete at otakon, since we have attended the last 2 years and have had a video in it before. We never planned on submitting to PCM, but after reading one of the replies scott made on the PCM thread that said something about it being a small con and just needed some submissions, and that they did not care if videos had been submitted elsewhere at the same time. We didnt really see any fault in it and didnt think it would anger so many people.


our intentions weren't to troll, and we apologize for what has happened. We are removing ourselves from several competitions, but we are just not willing to give up on otakon, and i really hope we make it

User avatar
genestarwind21122
Samurai Master
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2003 4:52 pm
Location: space the final frontier....
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by genestarwind21122 » Wed Jun 18, 2003 8:53 pm

1.Yes I did send in a video
2. Serious/ Dramatic
3. 250

Now I thought before getting reviews on this video it was going to do well. And now well oh boy did I ever screw up. I think next year will be better for our videos in the past serval months has dramatically improved. Next year Otakon I think we'll have a shot. This year just pray that we don't get stomped on.

User avatar
dwchang
Sad Boy on Site
Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2002 12:22 am
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by dwchang » Wed Jun 18, 2003 8:59 pm

genestarwind21122 wrote:1.Yes I did send in a video
2. Serious/ Dramatic
3. 250

Now I thought before getting reviews on this video it was going to do well. And now well oh boy did I ever screw up. I think next year will be better for our videos in the past serval months has dramatically improved. Next year Otakon I think we'll have a shot. This year just pray that we don't get stomped on.
Uhm you know the deadline for saying the # of entries was like a week ago right?

You should read the entire thread before posting...basically we already have a good idea how many entries there are since they already started doing pre-screenings..i.e. no more entries being sent and so on.
-Daniel
Newest Video: Through the Years and Far Away aka Sad Girl in Space

MistyCaldwell
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2002 10:04 pm
Location: Virginia
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by MistyCaldwell » Wed Jun 18, 2003 9:02 pm

Yeah...I was WAY off.

Is the majority of the increase due to the online submissions? Or was there a general increase. I know that people assumed...but I have yet to hear an official statement.
Image

User avatar
iserlohn
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2001 1:40 am
Location: Wien, Österreich
Org Profile

Post by iserlohn » Wed Jun 18, 2003 9:50 pm

Vlad G Pohnert wrote:Well... One thing is for sure, Big contest will not suffer for this if creators start to withdraw for winning unexpectedly somwwhere elese, but the small cons will SUFFER if this starts to happen on a bigger scale....
I would say that the big cons are the ones who need the no-trolling rules most since they have the most entries - give other people a chance. With 180+ entries and only 30 who'll be in the finals, I'd want as few repeats in the contest as possible. It's almost pathetic how many videos I saw on the Fanime list (courtesy of Quu's LJ) that showed up on Otakon tapes. I doubt most of those people are even attending both cons, and if their goal is to see their video on the screen, why shop it around as a competing entry when they won't be at the con?

What I'd rather see is a rule for smaller cons requiring the creator to be present to win, and a "no prior wins" rule for larger cons, just to keep things fresh...but that's me.
"I'm recording an album tonight. Funny material and laughter will be dubbed in later."
--Bill Hicks

User avatar
Vlad G Pohnert
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2001 2:29 pm
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Org Profile

Post by Vlad G Pohnert » Wed Jun 18, 2003 10:04 pm

iserlohn wrote:
What I'd rather see is a rule for smaller cons requiring the creator to be present to win, and a "no prior wins" rule for larger cons, just to keep things fresh...but that's me.
Well, I agree and don't.. If you do that as some cons, you will not get a lot of entires.. Yes, JACON has that rule, but lots of creators live there or go to it... BUt there are cons that want to have an AMV contest but would only end up with say 5 or less if you impose that rule...

My only concern here is, is it the contest making the rules or the creators. Doe creators have the right to dictate terms to a contest? If a contest says they don't mind trolling, does that mean we ban it? Personally I think it's up to use to, yes maybe remind people about being curtious a bit and not "flooding" everything with an entry, but on the other hand If a contest says "Tolling allowed" then why would I enter it it I don't agree with that. I really would have to have to create a huge subset of rules in a contest for just trolling to satisfy everyone's opinion...

Now please don't take this the wrong way.. I'n not arguing for the idea of trolling (as I would difine it I guess), but with so many contests overlaping and things are only going to get worse so whare we to police the contests ourselves, or leave it up to the contests to decide what trolling is and sending to the ones we believe are in the right? No one forces anyone to enter into a contest that they fell do not have the same definition for trolling as they feel...

I get the feeling that there will be people here who disagree with ny definition of trolling as well, so you just can't win :cry:

Vlad

Vlad

User avatar
dwchang
Sad Boy on Site
Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2002 12:22 am
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by dwchang » Wed Jun 18, 2003 10:09 pm

iserlohn wrote:It's almost pathetic how many videos I saw on the Fanime list (courtesy of Quu's LJ) that showed up on Otakon tapes. I doubt most of those people are even attending both cons, and if their goal is to see their video on the screen, why shop it around as a competing entry when they won't be at the con?
Funny since those same videos were at ACen too. Thank God ACen has a no trolling rule so a ton of them were DQ'ed right off the bat. People should read the rules. Haha...oh well...

In the end, it's a personal choice to submit to a con or not. It's also a personal choice if you think you've gotten enough recognition or not. At the same time, one needs to respect their other peers (in particular the local creators) before submitting.

It's also a personal thing as to what the definition of trolling is. It's probably different to each one of us. I have my own definition and so do you. So it's all relative. There is no SET definition, thus this argument is moot. All of us have different definitions and there's no way all of us will agree.

With that said, I'm not saying I'd particularly agree to some of these incidents, but who am I to judge? It's up to that person and I have my own opinion which well...doesn't matter in the big scheme of things.
-Daniel
Newest Video: Through the Years and Far Away aka Sad Girl in Space

User avatar
hackerzc
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2001 4:44 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD
Org Profile

Post by hackerzc » Thu Jun 19, 2003 7:06 am

iserlohn wrote:
Vlad G Pohnert wrote:Well... One thing is for sure, Big contest will not suffer for this if creators start to withdraw for winning unexpectedly somwwhere elese, but the small cons will SUFFER if this starts to happen on a bigger scale....
I would say that the big cons are the ones who need the no-trolling rules most since they have the most entries - give other people a chance. With 180+ entries and only 30 who'll be in the finals, I'd want as few repeats in the contest as possible. It's almost pathetic how many videos I saw on the Fanime list (courtesy of Quu's LJ) that showed up on Otakon tapes. I doubt most of those people are even attending both cons, and if their goal is to see their video on the screen, why shop it around as a competing entry when they won't be at the con?

What I'd rather see is a rule for smaller cons requiring the creator to be present to win, and a "no prior wins" rule for larger cons, just to keep things fresh...but that's me.
Well in the AMV maling list we have been discussing the possibility of having an entry fee to compeat in contests of like $40 or so.

The reasoning behind it is that the entry fee would be used to pay for the membership to the con for creators that attend, and those that want to compeat and don't attend, the money can be used to ship them their awards and a copy of the contest tape or something.
Also, this would help cut down on trolling and those who submit to a billion contests at once. Because you can only enter as many contests as you can afford to enter. Which wil be an incentive to actually attend a con you submitt to.

Also, for those that think paying a fee to compeat is unfair, we have even come up with a way around that. Non-compeating entries can submitt for free and they will be shown, and as long as you follow the basic format rules (proper video format, signed submission form, etc) you WILL be shown (just like Otakon overflow screenings).

I really like the idea because it help benifit all parties involved.
People who just want their videos shown can do so, and those wishing to compeat without interfearence of trolling and multi-submitters can do so. Also, it could generate some extra revenue for the convention which can be used for bigger, better showings, or prizes like cash os trophy awards.

Large cons could use it as a way of limiting the number of submissions they recieve, while smaller cans can forgo any charge at all, there by attracting more submissions to their cons.
It's basicly just a way to evenly distribute AMV's a little better.

The only issue i can truly see being a problem would be the legality of all this. I have found over the past year from various conversations, that when Money and AMV's mix, they usually have a bad reaction.

If anyone was to do this, I would see AX being the first.
John Westbrook
Otakon, Fan Parody Dept. Head

User avatar
Ashyukun
Medicinal Leech
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 12:53 pm
Location: KY
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by Ashyukun » Thu Jun 19, 2003 7:56 am

BaHaRa wrote:we have sent emails and withdrawn from the competing section of fanime and some others just now. we all very much wish to compete at otakon, since we have attended the last 2 years and have had a video in it before. We never planned on submitting to PCM, but after reading one of the replies scott made on the PCM thread that said something about it being a small con and just needed some submissions, and that they did not care if videos had been submitted elsewhere at the same time. We didnt really see any fault in it and didnt think it would anger so many people.


our intentions weren't to troll, and we apologize for what has happened. We are removing ourselves from several competitions, but we are just not willing to give up on otakon, and i really hope we make it
OK, no offense, but- if Otakon was that important to you (you're making it sound like it is the con you wanted to compete in and everything else is just secondary...) why did you submit it to so many cons beforehand- especially knowing (as anyone submitting should- it's in the rules we're supposed to read) that Otakon has anti-trolling rules? It would have made far more sense if Otakon were truly that important to have either kept it under wraps or simply just not entered it anywhere else. PCM isn't as much the problem here- it's a fairly small con, and they needed more entries. If it had just been entered there and won, most of us would probably not be having this discussion. But before that the video was entered into (and won) AniMazement and A-Kon, and at least A-Kon is a rather good-sized and well-known con- it's been around for 14 years, after all (sorry, I don't have attendance numbers handy).

Most of the editors here, when it comes to large, high-profile cons like Otakon, will make entries just for it, and then enter other contests with the video afterwards if it doesn't win and they still want to compete with it. I would hazard a guess that most of the videos from editors who have won in previous contests (period) that are entered at Otakon have never been seen by a large audience before. I know that's the case for several of the higher-profile editors, and it's at least in part to avoid the appearance of impropriety when it comes to trolling.

Was there any way to really know that video would do so well? In truth, no- it's impossible to predict what will happen in most contests. But after the reactions your previous video got, you had to realize that you have at least some semblance of skill and a decent shot at winning with the new one. I just really have a hard time buying the "But Otakon is soooo important to us" argument in this case. Otakon is really important to a lot of other editors who have not already won at 3 previous contests with their entry and have held their entries until now, and at least to me it doesn't seem fair- especially in a contest like Otakon where the chances of even making the contests as so low- for one of them to to potentially lose even the chance to compete before the audience because of it.

My opinions aside- I don't control what happens with the Otakon contest, only Matt to an extent does, along with the pre-screeners for the contest. If this video makes it through all the hoops to get into the contest, then that's the way things are, and if I lose to it (since depending on how my entry and this one are categorized, we could be in the same category), I'll not bitch about it too much, if at all. Things at contests don't always go along with what each of us individually consider right- but it's a part of life in general, and something we just have to accept and move on.
Bob 'Ash' Babcock
Electric Leech Productions

User avatar
hackerzc
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2001 4:44 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD
Org Profile

Post by hackerzc » Thu Jun 19, 2003 8:32 am

Ashyukun wrote:If it had just been entered there and won, most of us would probably not be having this discussion. But before that the video was entered into (and won) AniMazement and A-Kon, and at least A-Kon is a rather good-sized and well-known con- it's been around for 14 years, after all (sorry, I don't have attendance numbers handy).
Question, didn't AniMazement and A-Kon take place before the May 31st deadline for Otakon? (retorical question. I checked and they did). Dosen't that SAY something? Please say I'm not the only one that notices this.

Oh yeah and BaHaRa. I remember reading in another thread, you said you submitted to so many cons so you could get input right?
Why didn't you just upload the video for people to download form animemusicvideos.org? I mean, I got tons of great feedback before my video was ever seen by an "at con" audiance. And still, you have yet to upload it.
There is just something about all this that's not adding up...
John Westbrook
Otakon, Fan Parody Dept. Head

Locked

Return to “AMV Contests”