I'd take you up on it... except I have never coded anything more complicated than Avisynth scripts and xhtml sites! ^_^;
Hopefully, someone more competent than me can do it...
Still, I want to thank you for creating that tool in the first place: it's probably one of the most useful applications for making videos!
S.
Resizing woes
- Keeper of Hellfire
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 6:13 am
- Location: Germany
While this is true, I prefer 768 x 432 for final encode of 16:9 footage. I did encounter playback problems with footage wider than 768 pixels - the right side of the video that did exceed the 768 pixels was only random colored noise. It may be a rare problem and depend on the combination of player, codec and version of DirectShow. But the fact that it can happen stops me from using wider resolutions.trythil wrote:The reason why 848x480 is so popular is because it preserves all 480 vertical lines of a 720x480 image, vs. 768x432, which mashes them together.
-
trythil
- is
- Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2002 5:54 am
- Status: N͋̀͒̆ͣ͋ͤ̍ͮ͌ͭ̔̊͒ͧ̿
- Location: N????????????????
Interesting. I haven't seen that, but I'll have to check that out. Seems like it'd be an issue for any HD stuff...Keeper of Hellfire wrote:While this is true, I prefer 768 x 432 for final encode of 16:9 footage. I did encounter playback problems with footage wider than 768 pixels - the right side of the video that did exceed the 768 pixels was only random colored noise. It may be a rare problem and depend on the combination of player, codec and version of DirectShow. But the fact that it can happen stops me from using wider resolutions.
One way to get around that problem with standard-definition footage, though, is to encode at 720x480 and set the sample/pixel aspect ratio flags accordingly.
-
trythil
- is
- Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2002 5:54 am
- Status: N͋̀͒̆ͣ͋ͤ̍ͮ͌ͭ̔̊͒ͧ̿
- Location: N????????????????
Well, it might be. If the issue is in the resizer that won't really help at all.trythil wrote:Interesting. I haven't seen that, but I'll have to check that out. Seems like it'd be an issue for any HD stuff...Keeper of Hellfire wrote:While this is true, I prefer 768 x 432 for final encode of 16:9 footage. I did encounter playback problems with footage wider than 768 pixels - the right side of the video that did exceed the 768 pixels was only random colored noise. It may be a rare problem and depend on the combination of player, codec and version of DirectShow. But the fact that it can happen stops me from using wider resolutions.
One way to get around that problem with standard-definition footage, though, is to encode at 720x480 and set the sample/pixel aspect ratio flags accordingly.