>_>TaranT wrote:Heh, I've got you beat. I just finished a romance vid yesterday (it's for Anime Evolution), and it starts with a 4 sec fade into a 13 second clip. The longest scene is 12 sec including 3 sec crossfades at both ends. No cuts at all in this one.
I (sadly) agree with you there that such videos generally won't be popular and I'd be lying if I didn't say I wasn't curious to see how my latest slow romance video will be received. My guess is fairly lightly.TaranT wrote:Vids like this are D.O.A. as far as popularity ratings and contests go, simply because the average viewer's attention span is about as long as a bomb blast in a Jerry Bruckheimer movie. Newbs think it's easy to just drop two scenes over each other, and they don't see the hours it takes to just set the start and end points. Not to mention controlling the speed change of any moving elements, as well as controlling the viewers eye. Crossfades are one of the most difficult things to get right (and I've seen good vids damaged or ruined by bad dissolves). But when it's done right, a long fade is a thing of beauty.
And I have also spent time tweaking fades frame by frame. It's important.
I mean sure I've made a romance video that is remotely popular, but the song is quite a bit more dynamic then this one (is that even possible?!
At the same time, I won't lie, I was quite happy to see that I made a romance video that people seem to appreciate. I guess this may come across as arrogant (and I apologize for that), but I think it goes to show a romance video CAN appeal to people beyond just romance fans. Not necessarily mine even. I named quite a few others earlier that are pretty popular, so it is possible...just difficult.
Also to newer folks, don't let this be a motivation or anything. Please don't take me saying that as such. I mean sure it's nice, but ultimately that's not what it's about. Hopefully you won't focus on me evem talking about that >_> (then why did you mention it? shaddup. Wait I'm talking to myself).
As for speed changes, I do the same thing to make a scene just long enough (usually for a long dissolve). This is another thing I take hours to tweak and as you said, it can go a long way. And yes, I will debate something like 95% vs. 90%. I'm that big of a obsessive compulsive ;_;
Ooh! Another "trick," that I also use. Motion settings in an editing program can go a long way in "covering up" lack of motion in a scene. Again, read my video description for details, but more than once I use a VERY slow zoom out (start at maybe 90% -> 100%) on a still or a scene with very little motion. It adds just enough motion, but doesn't ruin the mood.TaranT wrote:As long as we're talking about techniques for romance vids, did anyone mention slow pans across scenery, faces, etc? Or slow zooms and pullbacks? Standard stuff, but good ways to compensate for the monotony (relatively speaking) of long scenes.
Sadly, it's difficult to sync on just a still since people will yawn and this little amount of motion can make it "bearable" and in some cases, enhance.
Maybe I shouldn't be admitting all the hacks and tricks I use

[/size]
