Introducing a new DV industry standard, by Danielwang!

Corran · Post by **Corran** » Wed Dec 17, 2003 9:56 pm

Red Wolf wrote:
DJ_Izumi wrote:I think it's funny how he seems to think EVERYTHING is flawed. HufYUV is yucky, Divx is bad, DVD's are insufficent, MS Mpeg-4 has secret filter gremlins in it that devower your soul.
I thought dealing with anything from MS did devower your soul.

Appartently he knows at least one thing. But that is it...

danielwang · Post by **danielwang** » Wed Dec 17, 2003 10:16 pm

<response.my />

1000 Posts Of Forum Trash

I'm sorry, I was unofrtunately oblivious to the fact that I was annying the hell out of the org. Too many late night caffeine-fueled posts has earned me another alienation, I guess.

But seriously, I apologize for any problems I might have caused.

You see, I'm not really an idiot, or a person who believes he knows everything, or other forum filth. I am well aware that I am unqualified to answer these question. I haven't even created a decent AMV and I know it![/u]

What my objective in most of these 1000 forum posts was simply to boose my ego.

When I pretend to know about something, I know that I'm just being a clueless person. And that's completely intentional!
The point is, although I may be anoyying the people who DO know that I'm "faking it", I just may be able to fool somebody into believing my #!/bin/BS long enough to look smart. And now, I take the title "Village Idiot" as an excuse to post even more random nonsense posts.

But then, I'm making myself look really stupid.

With this post, in an already useless that serves as an icon reflecting my immaturity, I commit to posting only sensible replies to the technical forums. It's better for everyone.

In commmemoration of reaching 1000 posts (soon) of CRAP:
You may spam me back at danielwang@myrealbox.com
You have my permission to spam, insult, flame, harass and threaten me using the above email address, which is really my email address. Use a fake email if you must - but I may reply!

Scintilla · Post by **Scintilla** » Wed Dec 17, 2003 10:41 pm

..........

Is this some joke of Phade (or another admin)'s?

Lyrs · Post by **Lyrs** » Wed Dec 17, 2003 10:48 pm

Hardly a joke, this is the best of commedies. I never expected the rest of the forums to be this interesting and dynamic but I'm getting a fresh perspective for why people would enjoy these forums so much. They're so full of "OMG!"

The stuff up here are hardcore, not like OT.

Corran · Post by **Corran** » Wed Dec 17, 2003 10:57 pm

Scintilla wrote:..........

x |any number conceivable that is -1<0 , 1>0|

trythil · Post by **trythil** » Wed Dec 17, 2003 11:18 pm

Corran Productions wrote:
Scintilla wrote:..........

x |any number conceivable that is -1<0 , 1>0|

How about {x | -1 < x < 0 or 0 > x > 1}? Because "any conceivable number" would include x in C, and you can't perform comparison operations in C.

Corran · Post by **Corran** » Wed Dec 17, 2003 11:24 pm

trythil wrote:
Corran Productions wrote:
Scintilla wrote:..........

x |any number conceivable that is -1<0 , 1>0|
How about {x | -1 < x < 0 or 0 > x > 1}? Because "any conceivable number" would include x in C, and you can't perform comparison operations in C.

ok

Scintilla · Post by **Scintilla** » Thu Dec 18, 2003 12:57 am

trythil wrote:
Corran Productions wrote:
Scintilla wrote:..........
x |any number conceivable that is -1<0 , 1>0|
How about {x | -1 < x < 0 or 0 > x > 1}?

Wait, so the second half of that is "0 is greater than x, but x is greater than 1"? Did I read that right?

Corran · Post by **Corran** » Thu Dec 18, 2003 1:05 am

yes x

trythil · Post by **trythil** » Thu Dec 18, 2003 1:25 am

Scintilla wrote:
trythil wrote:
Corran Productions wrote:
Scintilla wrote:..........
x |any number conceivable that is -1<0 , 1>0|
How about {x | -1 < x < 0 or 0 > x > 1}?
Wait, so the second half of that is "0 is greater than x, but x is greater than 1"? Did I read that right?

Not "but", "or" -- so we get the union. {x | -1 < x < 0 } U {x | 0 > x > 1 }.

I should have also specified x is an element of R, otherwise we'd still be fux0red.