Even Clinton says to get over the Uranium claim

madmallard · Post by **madmallard** » Wed Jul 23, 2003 1:19 pm

http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/07/ ... index.html

Gee, even captain skippy says this is not the wisest course of action to harp on a claim included in a speech that was never false in the first place. Maybe the rest of his party will catch a clue?

he even goes on to say:
"People can quarrel with whether we should have more troops in Afghanistan or internationalize Iraq or whatever, but it is incontestable that on the day I left office, there were unaccounted for stocks of biological and chemical weapons."

Personally, I believe Clinton 'wanted' to try and do something direct about Iraq, but was too concerned over image to actively participate, so he tried mostly ineffective side tactics. I think he's glad things went as good as they have.

hitmanyr2k · Post by **hitmanyr2k** » Wed Jul 23, 2003 1:53 pm

Politics and war is all bullshit anyway. I don't know why people get so passionate about defending this party and that party because all politicians have their own agenda and it's rarely for the good of the people. They're nothing but parasites that bicker about this and that to make themselves look good. I'm willing to bet this war won't make a bit of difference in the long run. For every asshole that's eliminated there's always another one to take his place.

the Black Monarch · Post by **the Black Monarch** » Wed Jul 23, 2003 3:35 pm

I support presidents who get things done, not those who talk about getting things done but are afraid to do so because of image.

Org Profile · Post by **Otohiko** » Wed Jul 23, 2003 5:33 pm

Clinton helped initiated bombing Serbia. And Iraq.

And people who initiate bombing stuff for no good reason can suck my c0x0r.

And I'll shut up because I'm surrounded by armed Americans.