don't upload amvs with 'sexual nudity'

Machine · Post by **Machine** » Mon Jul 14, 2003 10:02 am

AbsoluteDestiny wrote:I passed fyrt's video, because the explicitness was practically "off camera" and brief.

I doubt things like Nine Inch Nails with Perfect Blue sex scenes would get any approval though

Beowulf · Post by **Beowulf** » Mon Jul 14, 2003 12:28 pm

Ramma titties = A-OK

Ninja Scroll woman getting fucked in the ass = Not OK

That is a general guideline.

SSJVegita0609 · Post by **SSJVegita0609** » Mon Jul 14, 2003 1:12 pm

Beowulf wrote:Ramma titties = A-OK

Ninja Scroll woman getting fucked in the ass = Not OK

That is a general guideline.

That just about sums it up right there.

fyrtenheimer · Post by **fyrtenheimer** » Mon Jul 14, 2003 3:12 pm

AbsoluteDestiny wrote:I passed fyrt's video, because the explicitness was practically "off camera" and brief.

Me

u

My ankle is amazingly all better now.

Garylisk · Post by **Garylisk** » Mon Jul 14, 2003 3:15 pm

Beowulf wrote:Ramma titties = A-OK

Ninja Scroll woman getting fucked in the ass = Not OK

That is a general guideline.

She wasn't necesarally getting fucked in the ass...

ithaqua · Post by **ithaqua** » Mon Jul 14, 2003 9:13 pm

People get so touchy around sodomy, don't they?

Besides, they're are several vids out there with topless girls, so one more would not be a big deal.

post-it · Post by **post-it** » Mon Jul 14, 2003 10:25 pm

in the US, a girl showing something is not normal.

where I come from, a girl not show something openly is consider teasing and she would be stoned to death ( to remove this BAD Infuance Behavior from being spread to other girls around her! )

besides, Kids see these AMV's too - we often forget that fact. T_T

Tab. · Post by **Tab.** » Mon Jul 14, 2003 10:27 pm

holy shit, where are you from? I'm moving there

fyrtenheimer · Post by **fyrtenheimer** » Tue Jul 15, 2003 12:15 am

Minnesota?

Lyrs · Post by **Lyrs** » Tue Jul 15, 2003 12:18 am

fyrtenheimer wrote:Minnesota?

rachel is statist!

/end