Michael Moore - hacked!

Lyrs · Post by **Lyrs** » Mon May 26, 2003 12:28 am

Well, considering the popularity of BFC, there's bound to be a lot of people are going to say lots of things...which is why democracy can sometimes suck and can sometimes be a blessing.

/end

Mroni · Post by **Mroni** » Mon May 26, 2003 12:35 am

Imagine Uncle Milo being pissed because someone hacked his lord god Micheal moore! It's a lie I tell you a lie!!!!

Mr Oni
Funny thing was Mcarthey was right alot of times.

NME · Post by **NME** » Mon May 26, 2003 12:42 am

kthulhu · Post by **kthulhu** » Mon May 26, 2003 1:21 am

UncleMilo wrote:The author of this website is blocking access to Michael Moore's website and this kind of hostile action offends me to the point that I will not even consider any of the author's statements. The author simply wants to "get" Michael Moore and so I consider most of the information devious and unreliable.

Who's doing what and what's happening now? Which website is doing what to another website?

Near as I can tell, some independent hackers/crackers/whatever took umbrage with Michael Moore and decided to hack his website and make links to other sites that they felt represented their view and truth.

The sites they linked to existed long before this hack occured, and I don't see even a tenuous link (unlike Michael Moore's "Lockheed was in the area of Littleton, and this must've had a psychological impact on the shooters" idea) between the hackers and the operators of said linked websites.

BTW, as I recall, <a href="http://www.hardylaw.net/Truth_About_Bow ... l">this</a> was a site that you previously said you could prove the points made on it wrong. You never did.

Just thought I'd mention that.

Keaton · Post by **Keaton** » Mon May 26, 2003 1:23 am

yuppa wrote:Why did they give the jerk the award anyway.

he deserved it

Tab. · Post by **Tab.** » Mon May 26, 2003 1:31 am

uh.. the site is back up :|

Mroni · Post by **Mroni** » Mon May 26, 2003 2:49 am

kthulhu wrote:
UncleMilo wrote:The author of this website is blocking access to Michael Moore's website and this kind of hostile action offends me to the point that I will not even consider any of the author's statements. The author simply wants to "get" Michael Moore and so I consider most of the information devious and unreliable.
Who's doing what and what's happening now? Which website is doing what to another website?

Near as I can tell, some independent hackers/crackers/whatever took umbrage with Michael Moore and decided to hack his website and make links to other sites that they felt represented their view and truth.

The sites they linked to existed long before this hack occured, and I don't see even a tenuous link (unlike Michael Moore's "Lockheed was in the area of Littleton, and this must've had a psychological impact on the shooters" idea) between the hackers and the operators of said linked websites.

BTW, as I recall, <a href="http://www.hardylaw.net/Truth_About_Bow ... l">this</a> was a site that you previously said you could prove the points made on it wrong. You never did.

Just thought I'd mention that.

Kthulu Milo is a coward he runs away and posts in his journal he is right you cannot argue with him. What were you thinking?

Mr Oni