Thanks a lot for your replies, everyone. Helps me out a lot.

Work, yes. A little bit.MetamorphosisStudios wrote:it would save you lots of work and also quality.
Matter of taste.MetamorphosisStudios wrote:Did you guys know that premiere is much better than Vegas? Btw I'm not hating or anything I'm just curious ^^
If you use Lagarith or UTvideo is usually makes a smaller file and saves on rendering time.Solafighter wrote:Work, yes. A little bit.MetamorphosisStudios wrote:it would save you lots of work and also quality.![]()
Quality, i dont think so. The last weeks i made a few tests of quality loose. If you render looseless(uncompressed) video material out of AE, the quality is the same(obviously, the uncompressed material is not small, depending of the resolution[720p/1080p]).
What i did:On those three tests, the quality was the very same. I put all 3 vids over eachother and checked very specific about any difference of quality, color tones and so on. I couldnt find any difference.
- Render a raw video without any editing with Premiere into a .mp4.
- Render a raw video without any editing with Sony Vegas into a .mp4 file (same settings as Premiere).
- Render a raw video without any editing with After Effects into an uncompressed, looseless .avi video, importing it into Sony Vegas, then rendering this material into a .mp4.
If you export from After Effects, what you want to achieve, is to get the same quality, as the raw footage, you put into Sony Vegas or Premiere(or other software). After Effects is able to do this.
If you had bad experience with this, please let me know, what export settings you used for AE.
Matter of taste.MetamorphosisStudios wrote:Did you guys know that premiere is much better than Vegas? Btw I'm not hating or anything I'm just curious ^^
I 100% agree with you but remember that AE is more of a motion graphics software nuke and fusion are meant for compositing I've used nuke x for 2 years now and it can be a pain in the a** to make some decent motiion graphics >.>MiyaDV wrote:
I could say Nuke, fusion, w/e are all way better then after effects, since their node-based and industry standards (AE is laughed at by professionals) but again that's on preference since you can achieve the same thing in both programs.
MiyaDV wrote: Hey Sola,
Do you render your final video from the program? That works well and all but I always found I could achieve better quality rendering the final thing lossless with audio, or rendering audio seperate to .wav too, then using x264 to encode instead (like megui with avisynth) or that amv app they got zarx264gui.
I have tried using premiere and I find it clunky, maybe its because I am inexperience but I just don't like the feel and look. Also, whenever I try using the dynamiclink between Premiere CS5 and AE CS5 it never works, I always get an error. So I am stuck with the same problem with both software.MetamorphosisStudios wrote:As a motion graphic designer and a 3D artist I just don't get why so many people use Vegas with AE >.>