Public QCs + Images in comments
- Nya-chan Production
- The :< point of view
- Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 11:21 am
- Status: White bracelet
- Location: Ward 7F
- Contact:
- SQ
- Doesn't have a title
- Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 8:11 pm
- Status: youtube.com/SQ
- Location: Upstate NY
- Contact:
Re: Public QCs + Images in comments
REALLY?ngsilver wrote:Just had to double check that it was the one you started, and yes, yes it is.
Wow.
No wonder you guys remember me, then.
Well.
Not going to lie, the fact that that thread is still being posted in makes me want to donate so I can get back in that forum.
Excuse me while I go check my paypal....
It's just 12 bucks to get the forum, right?
@Nya-chan
Don't mind them.
Call me whatever pronouns you want.
Discord: @standardquip (Vars)
BentoVid.com
BentoVid.com
- Nya-chan Production
- The :< point of view
- Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 11:21 am
- Status: White bracelet
- Location: Ward 7F
- Contact:
Re: Public QCs + Images in comments
I prefer "her", in general... you might find out why...
Mufufu ^^
Mufufu ^^
- SQ
- Doesn't have a title
- Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 8:11 pm
- Status: youtube.com/SQ
- Location: Upstate NY
- Contact:
Re: Public QCs + Images in comments
Well I just donated $20 to be all even and shit. Least I could do, I guess.
SO IN AN ATTEMPT TO GET BACK ON TOPIC.
Assuming Public QCs were viable, what sort of system would you all prefer?
Would you like the system where you pick and choose what QCs are public? Should there be a limit, like opinions?
Or would you prefer QCs to act like normal comments, and have them all show up publicly, with you having the ability to delete some (if that)?
Is there another way? Why?
Speaking of opinions.
Should the limit of 2 public opinions stay, or would you rather have a different system?
Personally, I think all opinions should be public by default with the creator (who is the receiver of the opinion) given only power to hide opinions.
Opinions are like reviews to a product, I think. Most other sites show all reviews. I was always sort of irritated that we were only allowed to show two of them.
SO IN AN ATTEMPT TO GET BACK ON TOPIC.
Assuming Public QCs were viable, what sort of system would you all prefer?
Would you like the system where you pick and choose what QCs are public? Should there be a limit, like opinions?
Or would you prefer QCs to act like normal comments, and have them all show up publicly, with you having the ability to delete some (if that)?
Is there another way? Why?
Speaking of opinions.
Should the limit of 2 public opinions stay, or would you rather have a different system?
Personally, I think all opinions should be public by default with the creator (who is the receiver of the opinion) given only power to hide opinions.
Opinions are like reviews to a product, I think. Most other sites show all reviews. I was always sort of irritated that we were only allowed to show two of them.
Discord: @standardquip (Vars)
BentoVid.com
BentoVid.com
- Panky
- Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 12:57 am
- Status: dozing...
- Location: some place called Kokomo...
Re: Public QCs + Images in comments
If I'm not wrong, I have found at some point that sending an opinion would let you see the other opinions on that same video. Maybe it's on purpose, or just a mistake? If someone could set it to public, I don't see much of a problem on making all of them public. Although some people wouldn't like to show X opinion that maybe said something offensive about it.
And about # of public QC's, since everyone is hidden behind anonymity, there are a whole lot more that are offensive. It's not like just some random comment would really matter to me, but maybe it does for someone else. Most of the times is people joking around, anyway (and if they are insulting the video, most of the times it is funny as well).
And about # of public QC's, since everyone is hidden behind anonymity, there are a whole lot more that are offensive. It's not like just some random comment would really matter to me, but maybe it does for someone else. Most of the times is people joking around, anyway (and if they are insulting the video, most of the times it is funny as well).
- dokidoki
- c0d3 m0nk3y
- Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 7:42 pm
- Status: BLEEP BLOOP!
- Location: doki doki space
- Contact:
Re: Public QCs + Images in comments
img tag now allowed in video descriptions
- Enigma
- That jolly ol' bastid
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2009 3:55 pm
- Status: Free
- Location: California
Re: Public QCs + Images in comments
Today is a great day.dokidoki wrote:img tag now allowed in video descriptions
- SQ
- Doesn't have a title
- Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 8:11 pm
- Status: youtube.com/SQ
- Location: Upstate NY
- Contact:
Re: Public QCs + Images in comments
Thank you!dokidoki wrote:img tag now allowed in video descriptions
Discord: @standardquip (Vars)
BentoVid.com
BentoVid.com
- Niotex
- The Phantom Canine
- Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2003 1:54 pm
- Status: Simply Insane
- Location: Netherlands
- NS
- I like pants
- Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 10:05 pm
- Status: Pants
- Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
- Contact:
Re: Public QCs + Images in comments
I sure as hell can't get it to work... I'm doing something wrong obviously. What is the correct way the tags need to look?