Why tying "video quality" to frame size and rate is dumb.

General discussion of Anime Music Videos
Locked
User avatar
Kitsuner
Maximum Hotness
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2003 8:38 pm
Status: Top Breeder
Location: Chicago, IL
Org Profile

Re: Why tying "video quality" to frame size and rate is dumb.

Post by Kitsuner » Sat Jun 13, 2009 5:10 pm

Knowname wrote:(which is why I came up with the pem idea that Kitsuner intentionaly or unintentionaly used in his retrospect video)
What's the pem idea?
OtakuGray wrote:Sometimes anime can branch out to a younger audience and this is one of those times where you wish children would just go die.
Stirspeare wrote:<Stirspeare> Lopez: Vanquish my virginity and flood me with kit. ["Ladies..."]

User avatar
EvaFan
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 10:25 pm
Status: (*゚▽゚)o旦~ ー乾杯ー♪
Location: Somerset, KY
Org Profile

Re: Why tying "video quality" to frame size and rate is dumb.

Post by EvaFan » Sat Jun 13, 2009 8:38 pm

Beowulf wrote:
Eva-Fan wrote:Right back atcha pal |:>
oh cmon its a joke.
again... right back atcha pal |:>

I actually agree with your posts for the most part. If the video isn't effecting your viewing experience then I don't really even see a reason to even rate it down but that's just me.
"The people cannot be [...] always, well informed. The part which is wrong will be discontented, in proportion to [...] the facts they misconceive. If they remain quiet under such misconceptions, it is lethargy, the forerunner of death to public liberty. What country can preserve its liberties, if it's rulers are not warned [...] that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants."-Thomas Jefferson

trythil
is
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2002 5:54 am
Status: N͋̀͒̆ͣ͋ͤ̍ͮ͌ͭ̔̊͒ͧ̿
Location: N????????????????
Org Profile

Re: Why tying "video quality" to frame size and rate is dumb.

Post by trythil » Sun Jun 14, 2009 4:27 am

Yeah, I think this thread has run its course.

Amusing aside: If you search the archives, you may come across a thread from 2005 discussing things that people hated about videos; I think it was titled "I hate this" or something. Can't remember. Anyway, I posted several long rants about -- you guessed it -- video quality in that thread. Now, I don't know exactly what I wrote -- I don't have the patience to dig the actual thread up* -- but I bet what I wrote is totally inconsistent with what I wrote in this thread.

* The nice thing about pissing people off is that you can sometimes get those people to do work for you.

User avatar
Nya-chan Production
The :< point of view
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 11:21 am
Status: White bracelet
Location: Ward 7F
Contact:
Org Profile

Re: Why tying "video quality" to frame size and rate is dumb.

Post by Nya-chan Production » Sun Jun 14, 2009 4:33 am

I am currently making 640x480 vid. I am using the best sources I could get, and try to make it look the best as I can (honestly, I'd have to vector about 2000 frames approx., if I wanted to improve it "radically", which just isn't something I see myself doing for a single vid).

And I know that from "certain" people I won't get better OP for quality than (say) 8? Maybe even 7, hey, it's 640 x 480, nobody uses that anymore, hahaha!

It just makes me kinda sad. I feel like going and give 9 to that 320 x 240 vid that I have seen recently. It might be old, when it's on fullscreen it looks BAD, but when I play it in 320 x 240 window it looks splendid.

Hell, I might even give it a ten.
Image

Locked

Return to “General AMV”