Short vs Long AMVs?

[Ikore]

exactly... what are we talking about?

but hell yeaaaa, if in the end it was enjoyable, it doesn't matter if that was long, short, twisted ot whatever it was done... XD

[Sonydjsnmix]

2:30 tends to be my ideal because most people fail at making a 3 or more min videos work.

[Niotex]

As long as the video is actually good it shouldn't matter. People will always bitch about length unless you give them a experience worth while. And even then there will be some twats whining.

[JudgeHolden]

Kids like fast and quick videos, cuz it makes them feel better about their premature ejaculation.

[Farlo]

i make my videos short, so people dont have to suffer as long to get to the end.

[Enigma]

I rather watch both as long as there good and leave me entertained.

[JaddziaDax]

the video should only be as long as it needs to be

[Otohiko]

I don't really care, but I like well-structured videos that spend whatever their running length well. Long videos are obviously more challenging, since pacing in them becomes really important - as much as people like to blame attention spans for lower popularity of short videos, it really is often the editor's fault; other times it's the sources' fault, since some music and visual sources can just get downright repetitive after a few minutes. So to editors, really the advice should be to consider their sources and ability to create good structure and pacing before going into a project.

[Knowname]

so many blow their lode in the first 20 seconds. It's annoying.

[godix]

so many blow their lode in the first 20 seconds. It's annoying.

I responded to some spam and got some pills that fix the problem. I can last up to 60 seconds now.