Oh man, you guys HAVE to see this. lol

JaddziaDax · Post by **JaddziaDax** » Wed Jun 25, 2008 8:23 pm

anyone can be "pretty" given the right lighting, makeup, camera angles and amount of photoshop work.

godix · Post by **godix** » Thu Jun 26, 2008 12:14 am

JaddziaDax wrote:anyone can be "pretty" given the right lighting, makeup, camera angles and amount of photoshop work.

Damn straight. Those glamor shots photo studios in malls across America specialize in that. ANYONE can look good, provided your definition of 'looking good' is a total slut who wears 5 lbs of makeup.

Sukunai · Post by **Sukunai** » Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:41 am

Well none of those losers is using an actual name, that's a red flag right there. If I am looking for someone, it sure the fuck isn't a damn nickname I'm looking for. No real name means no accountability.

Second, an education is just as easy to claim "oh yeah, I have a masters, suuuuuuure".

And third, hell they only offer a nickname, no accountability, why not just pick a picture of some superficial slob off the net, and claim it's you?

If I was actually looking for someone online, I would require an actual name, actual address, actual phone number, an IM program so I could see you on webcam, and a long list of all the things you like and dislike.

I wouldn't even begin to be interested in their absence. Life is short and I wouldn't be wasting it on vague unprovable shallow losers.

If the program is free, that's also a red flag. I'd be more inclined to trust something like that eHarmony service. At least they are taking the whole idea of finding the right person seriously.

And for all of us that have passed 40, we have the edge on all of these stupid retards, we know the truth. Everyone ends up looking the same, old and wrinkled at the very least.
Picking a partner for something as valueless as looks, which won't last, shows the person is too stupid to spend your life with.

guy07 · Post by **guy07** » Thu Jun 26, 2008 10:36 am

Sukunai wrote:
And for all of us that have passed 40, we have the edge on all of these stupid retards, we know the truth. Everyone ends up looking the same, old and wrinkled at the very least.

Everyone ... except David Hasselhoff! That guy only looks sexier as he gets older.

Yok/0 · Post by **Yok/0** » Thu Jun 26, 2008 10:43 am

Are we any different?
I mean this whole donators Thread is full of "beautiful people" and sophisticates like Oto.
Think about it. : P

Org Profile · Post by **Otohiko** » Thu Jun 26, 2008 11:25 am

Yoko+ wrote:Are we any different?
I mean this whole donators Thread is full of "beautiful people" and sophisticates like Oto.
Think about it. : P

Of course if only that translated into actual attractiveness, I'd be swimming in women right now

BasharOfTheAges · Post by **BasharOfTheAges** » Thu Jun 26, 2008 11:56 am

That is an interesting point Yoko... but which, brains or beauty, is more beneficial to the species as a whole? Real beauty - not cosmetically altered or altered by crazy dieting historically showed the health of a potential partner. I'd wager most of those people aren't actually healthy mates... On the other hand, i'm sure quite a few people here aren't actually intelligent, so we're back to square one with another added level of discourse.

Sukunai · Post by **Sukunai** » Thu Jun 26, 2008 5:09 pm

Hmm by some standards I AM healthy, I obviously am well feed and not poor

But frankly, anyone calling me beautiful needs glasses.

JaddziaDax · Post by **JaddziaDax** » Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:58 pm

the org is a dating service?

Org Profile · Post by **Otohiko** » Thu Jun 26, 2008 9:07 pm

JaddziaDax wrote:the org is a dating service?

A/S/L?