If Can't Use DivX or Xvid Then.........
- krillin the villin
- Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2003 11:07 pm
- Location: greater states of being
yeah not really careing what the pros and other people say, Div-x and X-vid can be used in wmm/wmm2 as long as you get rid of the AC3 audio or the audio period, get rid of your giant X-vid everything wonderful codec pack, and that stupid FFDshow, i can do all files except h264... exsept on my laptop, vista will open all h264/x264/mvk you name it... it even has a save option now for "HDwidecreen X-box 360" at a woppin 7.2mps lol
i used wmm alot in the past and still do with live footage of stupid stuff like familys and sk8'n
i used wmm alot in the past and still do with live footage of stupid stuff like familys and sk8'n
Because you are good at amv's dosent meen you can't get yer arse kicked.
- Minion
- Joined: Sat May 22, 2004 10:16 pm
- Location: orlando
- Contact:
- Minion
- Joined: Sat May 22, 2004 10:16 pm
- Location: orlando
- Contact:
- Autraya
- Zero Punctuation
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2003 12:52 am
- Status: old
- Location: Terra Australis
- Contact:
The question has been answered guys, believe it or not by people who know what they are talking about. 
2 words;
USE HUFFYUV
Ignore the ppl talking about Divx/Xvid and pls gawd (aka DWP on this forum) lock eeet before it gets worse and more n00bs get confused with conflicting advice

2 words;
USE HUFFYUV
Ignore the ppl talking about Divx/Xvid and pls gawd (aka DWP on this forum) lock eeet before it gets worse and more n00bs get confused with conflicting advice
new banzors in the making :p
- Minion
- Joined: Sat May 22, 2004 10:16 pm
- Location: orlando
- Contact:
- downwithpants
- BIG PICTURE person
- Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2002 1:28 am
- Status: out of service
- Location: storrs, ct
lossless compression is recommended for your source, but... i don't care if people use xvid or divx. true it is more error-prone and lossy, but if it's good enough for them, let them have a ball.
my point is, there is no RIGHT WAY to make amvs. use whatever works. 10-15 years ago, most amv editors didn't have huge anime dvd collections and were using 2-deck vcrs. they didn't have Read <a href=http://www.a-m-v.org/guides/avtech31/>ErMaC & AbsoluteDestiny's Friendly AMV Guides</a> or dvd decrypter. they just used whatever they had in front of them, some of their own ingenuity, and made the best with what they had. they weren't as clean looking or precisely timed as today's videos, but they still entertained the hell out of the creators and fans at that time, and still do today.
my point is, there is no RIGHT WAY to make amvs. use whatever works. 10-15 years ago, most amv editors didn't have huge anime dvd collections and were using 2-deck vcrs. they didn't have Read <a href=http://www.a-m-v.org/guides/avtech31/>ErMaC & AbsoluteDestiny's Friendly AMV Guides</a> or dvd decrypter. they just used whatever they had in front of them, some of their own ingenuity, and made the best with what they had. they weren't as clean looking or precisely timed as today's videos, but they still entertained the hell out of the creators and fans at that time, and still do today.
maskandlayer()|My Guide to WMM 2.x
a-m-v.org Last.fm|<a href="http://www.frappr.com/animemusicvideosdotorg">Animemusicvideos.org Frappr</a>|<a href="http://tinyurl.com/2lryta"> Editors and fans against the misattribution of AMVs</a>
a-m-v.org Last.fm|<a href="http://www.frappr.com/animemusicvideosdotorg">Animemusicvideos.org Frappr</a>|<a href="http://tinyurl.com/2lryta"> Editors and fans against the misattribution of AMVs</a>
- BasharOfTheAges
- Just zis guy, you know?
- Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 11:32 pm
- Status: Breathing
- Location: Merrimack, NH
- Radical_Yue
- Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 8:45 pm
- Status: The flamer with heart of gold~<3
I might get torn to shreds for saying this, but you don't really have to use Huffy =\ When it comes to Windows Movie Maker there really isn't any way to preserve the purdy quality that you get with lossless...
There's another codec called "Intel Indeo 4.5" that you can re-encode your footage with in Virtual Dub Mod. The file sizes are very very small compared to the lossless and it still keeps the quality pretty nice. Just about the same quality as you'll get when you render an AVI from WMM (minus the interlacing)
I encoded my footage that I used for Soundless Screams, Esplodey-ness, and Give Me Wings in Intel Indeo 4.5, and they didn't come out bad looking >_>
Now Imma go get some coffee since I just woke up @_@
There's another codec called "Intel Indeo 4.5" that you can re-encode your footage with in Virtual Dub Mod. The file sizes are very very small compared to the lossless and it still keeps the quality pretty nice. Just about the same quality as you'll get when you render an AVI from WMM (minus the interlacing)
I encoded my footage that I used for Soundless Screams, Esplodey-ness, and Give Me Wings in Intel Indeo 4.5, and they didn't come out bad looking >_>
Now Imma go get some coffee since I just woke up @_@
- Cornwiggle
- Joined: Sat May 10, 2003 2:59 pm
- Location: Lost Ground
Isn't that exactly what I've been saying this entire time? It everything but WMM, it matters, in WMM the quality comes out EXACTLY the same.Radical_Yue wrote:I might get torn to shreds for saying this, but you don't really have to use Huffy =\ When it comes to Windows Movie Maker there really isn't any way to preserve the purdy quality that you get with lossless...
¯\(°_o)/¯