Most Improved Creator

S_N_I_P_E_R · Post by **S_N_I_P_E_R** » Tue Jan 30, 2007 7:25 am

Devil^Shin

greenjinjo · Post by **greenjinjo** » Tue Jan 30, 2007 3:22 pm

Greenjinjo

He finally stopped making videos = most improved

Szwagier · Post by **Szwagier** » Tue Jan 30, 2007 3:42 pm

greenjinjo wrote:Greenjinjo

He finally stopped making videos = most improved

:O
What's that and that then? :O

AMV_4000 · Post by **AMV_4000** » Fri Feb 02, 2007 8:56 pm

Question!

Most improved.. .Is it Most Improved since Last Year or Overall??

cause in 2005 i know a few editors who made a bunch of crap videos and turned it around in 2006... but if your talking overall then can you really be judging accurately? Some people started with really crappy amvs and have greatly improved.. so how could we judge this?

JudgeHolden · Post by **JudgeHolden** » Fri Feb 02, 2007 9:08 pm

Just vote for a popular editor you reconize .... that's what they did last year ... seems to work ...

Prodigi · Post by **Prodigi** » Fri Feb 02, 2007 9:51 pm

AMV_4000 wrote:Question!

Most improved.. .Is it Most Improved since Last Year or Overall??

cause in 2005 i know a few editors who made a bunch of crap videos and turned it around in 2006... but if your talking overall then can you really be judging accurately? Some people started with really crappy amvs and have greatly improved.. so how could we judge this?

Category description wrote:This award goes to the editor who has put out at least two or more videos in 2006 with the most significant and noticeable increase in the overall quality (i.e. visually, editing-wise, etc.) between the first and last videos of the year.

Fizziks · Post by **Fizziks** » Fri Feb 02, 2007 11:46 pm

Prodigi wrote:
AMV_4000 wrote:Question!

Most improved.. .Is it Most Improved since Last Year or Overall??

cause in 2005 i know a few editors who made a bunch of crap videos and turned it around in 2006... but if your talking overall then can you really be judging accurately? Some people started with really crappy amvs and have greatly improved.. so how could we judge this?

Category description wrote:This award goes to the editor who has put out at least two or more videos in 2006 with the most significant and noticeable increase in the overall quality (i.e. visually, editing-wise, etc.) between the first and last videos of the year.

Hmmm...after reading the category description, if I may be so bold

, take a look at my first ever AMV released in mid-2006 (made with Windows Movie Maker):
http://www.animemusicvideos.org/members ... p?v=116679

And then my lastest AMV released at the end of 2006 (the link to which is in my sig).

AMV_4000 · Post by **AMV_4000** » Sat Feb 03, 2007 1:34 am

Prodigi wrote:
AMV_4000 wrote:Question!

Most improved.. .Is it Most Improved since Last Year or Overall??

cause in 2005 i know a few editors who made a bunch of crap videos and turned it around in 2006... but if your talking overall then can you really be judging accurately? Some people started with really crappy amvs and have greatly improved.. so how could we judge this?

Category description wrote:This award goes to the editor who has put out at least two or more videos in 2006 with the most significant and noticeable increase in the overall quality (i.e. visually, editing-wise, etc.) between the first and last videos of the year.

zomg! thx!! well if it werent for KOS...

but yeah, now that you have shown me that.. i see kewp isnt eligible... poor kewp...

Chiikaboom · Post by **Chiikaboom** » Sat Feb 03, 2007 3:00 am

xa billion on SenshiMamoru and Jade_eyed_angel

batmanMG · Post by **batmanMG** » Mon Feb 12, 2007 11:25 pm

all these nominations and im not mentioned once... im shocked SHOCKED... well not really...

me and Kristyrat for sure