jal0021 wrote:Which guests did the final judging? I'm just curious.
I believe the two Japanese guests were the singer (maya okamoto?) and the composer (name eludes me) and one US Guest. I won't go further into this though since well...judging was perfect per se.
outlawed wrote:Daniel Chang's Glory of Love video was excellent. Without seeing the rest of the entries for this year I could say it would be worth consideration for Best of Show. The pacing was done well and there wasn't the usual re-hash or running out of scenes moments that many drama vids fall into. Plus I was happy that the music and themes in the AMV matched the original themes of the show(Escaflowne).
Thank you very much! Yeah I tried very hard to find "perfect" scenes (hopefully it worked). This is where most of the time went into. I am also glad that you see the "music/theme" matching the show itself. I tried very hard to illustrate the relationship through the song rather than the other way around. I hope that makes sense. I guess I should stop since well...it's not really related to the contest results and I have a post in the announcements page. Thanks a lot though!
Nappy wrote:Is that really a rule o_O I mean do alot of contests use a rule like that, if so It's pretty messed up and might cause ppl not to bother entering smaller contests because omg they might win and not be able to win the larger contests they really wanted to win.
It's the rule for ACen (it's in there) and I think even for Otakon. Not all cons do this, but I do see why they do this at the ones that do. I hate to be brutally honest, but there are *A LOT* of award trolls on the .org. People who just care about awards and enter into every contest. I don't think I need to explain that this is rude to the other creators in the contest (who might be cut) and at the same time rude since their videos have already received recognition.
No offense, but...well...I dislike this mentality QUITE a bit. It really defeats the purpose of AMVs in general (having fun) and makes the entire thing one giant competition (the people who only make to win or at the least submit to EVERY con). Also, to be honest, if you submitted to EVERY con, statistically, you're bound to win a few. IMO though I find those wins a bit empty and have never understood the necessity to enter every con and win a few awards...I'd rather win one or two from specific cons that are special to me and that I am in attendence for. I'd imagine it'd feel a lot better being their and being formally recognized than receiving my pretty trophy and staring at it (with that ego boost it gives....funny since well...you're bound to win eventually).
Don't get me wrong, I agree with your points about the "best video" winning, but at the same time, how would you feel if a video like "Odorikuruu" was in EVERY con and won EVERY award. That would be wrong since other videos would not receive recognition. Even if "Odorikuruu" or another video is "better" they already did receive recognition right?
Isn't it more polite to let others receive recognition for their hard work as well? As much as it says it's a "contest" and people are "competitive", I (to a degree) back this...or rather, I back it up when a con enforces it. There are plenty of cons who don't do this and they can do that as well. I basically agree with what the cons choose because well..it's their contest. Wow, I'm not making sense

.
In conclusion, what I am trying to say is that their is a reason for this rule and at the same time it's not set in stone for every con. Unfortunately, it is the case for ACen and Otakon and I see their reasonings and respect it. In fact, I agree with it for these cons since they receive so many entries that it would be unfortunate for great videos to not receive recognition b/c of well...a video (that is great mind you) that has already received recognition.
BTW I just wanna state that I am NOT attacking you. You just touched a nerve and annoyance I have in the community. In fact, I think you're a nice guy and you were just bringing up the point. So please don't take this as an attack to you, I am just arguing the point...not you

.