Promotion for best no effects and use of simplicity.

Knowname · Post by **Knowname** » Sat Jan 22, 2005 8:03 pm

Tyler_Darko wrote:"Best use of simplicity" is a ridiculous category

Where is the "Best use of window video maker" category ?

yes that's my most hated one, I don't look for simplicity in a video. Besides this is 2004, EVERYBODY uses transitions in their video! I think simplicity should be if the only used Premeire and not AE/ Photoshop or something.

Touya_girl · Post by **Touya_girl** » Sat Jan 22, 2005 8:47 pm

If we had a best use of WMM category all my vids would be in cause that's all I use. The program does have some good effects if you'll willing to spend money for them.

Voices_Of_Ryan · Post by **Voices_Of_Ryan** » Sat Jan 22, 2005 8:54 pm

You know, a best wmm catagory would be retarded to the point of blinding me.

Seriously, you can make effects in WMM, it doesnt HAVE to be a simple video. Not only that but then how about a best Premiere 6.5 and a best Premiere 6.0 and a best Vegas and Ulead.

Touya_girl · Post by **Touya_girl** » Sat Jan 22, 2005 8:57 pm

it would get very repetative

Voices_Of_Ryan · Post by **Voices_Of_Ryan** » Sat Jan 22, 2005 8:59 pm

Touya_girl wrote:it would get very repetative

Insanely so.
I just get really odd when people start talking about how wmm makes you a worse editor and it's a handicap and it needs its own catagory.

If you can't make a good amv, you can't on anything.

Touya_girl · Post by **Touya_girl** » Sat Jan 22, 2005 9:04 pm

I personally think that you're a better editor if you can make a good video with WMM.

SnhKnives · Post by **SnhKnives** » Sat Jan 22, 2005 9:11 pm

Touya_girl wrote:I personally think that you're a better editor if you can make a good video with WMM.

I think it just means you are good with manipulating a program, called windows movie maker

lol

Voices_Of_Ryan · Post by **Voices_Of_Ryan** » Sat Jan 22, 2005 9:14 pm

SnhKnives wrote:
Touya_girl wrote:I personally think that you're a better editor if you can make a good video with WMM.
I think it just means you are good with manipulating a program, called windows movie maker

lol

It's not anyworse then the GODAWFUL adobe 7.0 (although I will say, if you get 7.0 it can go pretty far but still).

SnhKnives · Post by **SnhKnives** » Sat Jan 22, 2005 10:00 pm

Voices_Of_Ryan wrote:
SnhKnives wrote:
Touya_girl wrote:I personally think that you're a better editor if you can make a good video with WMM.
I think it just means you are good with manipulating a program, called windows movie maker

lol

It's not anyworse then the GODAWFUL adobe 7.0 (although I will say, if you get 7.0 it can go pretty far but still).

hey premiere pro pwns, dont diss it

lol

Voices_Of_Ryan · Post by **Voices_Of_Ryan** » Sat Jan 22, 2005 10:24 pm

SnhKnives wrote:
Voices_Of_Ryan wrote:
SnhKnives wrote:
Touya_girl wrote:I personally think that you're a better editor if you can make a good video with WMM.
I think it just means you are good with manipulating a program, called windows movie maker

lol

It's not anyworse then the GODAWFUL adobe 7.0 (although I will say, if you get 7.0 it can go pretty far but still).
hey premiere pro pwns, dont diss it

lol

You know what "pwns"?
Getting to Use A/B layers in 6.5... Yes.