Crappy standardized tests
- J-0080
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2003 7:37 pm
- Location: Mid-West Side Laying On: Fangirls
- billy_wires
- Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 12:46 am
- Location: Huntsville, AL
Ughh, that math portion was disgusting! I was offended that math that low brow is considered acceptable testing standard for college, where you take calculus and such. Oh well. The writing section was hard for me because someone felt the need to play the bongos next door, and I couldn't concentrate.

- Savia
- Chocolate teapot
- Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 3:40 pm
- Location: Reading, UK
If you know it all already, what's the point of letting you in to the college?billy_wires wrote:Ughh, that math portion was disgusting! I was offended that math that low brow is considered acceptable testing standard for college, where you take calculus and such. Oh well. The writing section was hard for me because someone felt the need to play the bongos next door, and I couldn't concentrate.
Seriously though, the test standards are de facto lower than that of the work at the college.
"A creator needs only one enthusiast to justify him." - Man Ray
"Restrictions breed creativity." - Mark Rosewater
A Freudian slip is where you say one thing, but mean your mother.
"Restrictions breed creativity." - Mark Rosewater
A Freudian slip is where you say one thing, but mean your mother.
- Toecutter
- Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2003 2:21 am
- Location: Oregon
I managed a 1210 on the SAT I (I decided to take it once, and didn't bother to study). I'm pretty good at school, but my memory is shot to hell, which isn't much help when I'm trying to solve problems I haven't had to mess with in the last few years.
The problem with the SAT's, is the fact they test material that SHOULD be covered by every elementary school, but usually isn't. What really pisses me off, is how the system has made it so easy to pass the test, if you shovel out hundreds of dollars to get the manuals. The manuals don't actually cover the old material you should know, but just teach you how to cheat on the test. It's just as bad as the english litterature classes that use the Cliff's Notes, because heaven forbid someone thinks for themselves.
The problem with the SAT's, is the fact they test material that SHOULD be covered by every elementary school, but usually isn't. What really pisses me off, is how the system has made it so easy to pass the test, if you shovel out hundreds of dollars to get the manuals. The manuals don't actually cover the old material you should know, but just teach you how to cheat on the test. It's just as bad as the english litterature classes that use the Cliff's Notes, because heaven forbid someone thinks for themselves.
GoatMan
was here!
was here!
- billy_wires
- Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 12:46 am
- Location: Huntsville, AL
I see your point. But still, they could have incorperated some trig...Savia wrote:If you know it all already, what's the point of letting you in to the college?billy_wires wrote:Ughh, that math portion was disgusting! I was offended that math that low brow is considered acceptable testing standard for college, where you take calculus and such. Oh well. The writing section was hard for me because someone felt the need to play the bongos next door, and I couldn't concentrate.
Seriously though, the test standards are de facto lower than that of the work at the college.

- downwithpants
- BIG PICTURE person
- Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2002 1:28 am
- Status: out of service
- Location: storrs, ct
don't worry the ap/ib calc and the ap/ib calc exam is pretty tough if you take it.billy_wires wrote:Ughh, that math portion was disgusting! I was offended that math that low brow is considered acceptable testing standard for college, where you take calculus and such.
maskandlayer()|My Guide to WMM 2.x
a-m-v.org Last.fm|<a href="http://www.frappr.com/animemusicvideosdotorg">Animemusicvideos.org Frappr</a>|<a href="http://tinyurl.com/2lryta"> Editors and fans against the misattribution of AMVs</a>
a-m-v.org Last.fm|<a href="http://www.frappr.com/animemusicvideosdotorg">Animemusicvideos.org Frappr</a>|<a href="http://tinyurl.com/2lryta"> Editors and fans against the misattribution of AMVs</a>
- angelx03
- Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2003 7:13 pm
- Location: In school, Rochester NY mainly RIT; in home, Tampa, FL
- BogoSort
- Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2001 12:10 pm
- Location: Right behind you with a knife!
- Contact:
Damn, now I feel bad for taking that SAT prep course, back in my high school days. They had promised me a 200 point increase in my SAT score, and that plain just never materialized.Toecutter wrote:The problem with the SAT's, is the fact they test material that SHOULD be covered by every elementary school, but usually isn't. What really pisses me off, is how the system has made it so easy to pass the test, if you shovel out hundreds of dollars to get the manuals. The manuals don't actually cover the old material you should know, but just teach you how to cheat on the test. It's just as bad as the english litterature classes that use the Cliff's Notes, because heaven forbid someone thinks for themselves.
- Toecutter
- Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2003 2:21 am
- Location: Oregon
The SAT prep course is just a way to memorize the "formulas" for your typical SAT questions. You know, like "You're given a math problem with these parameters, so plug in these numbers this way, and you'll get the right answer". If you're like me, and have a horrible memory when it comes to stuff you haven't touched in months, then you're pretty much screwed. I found those old MAT-7 tests in elemetary and middle school far superior, because they tested your logical reasoning more than just memorized facts. Your ability to think rationally and solve problems with new data on the fly is far more important than what you know.Damn, now I feel bad for taking that SAT prep course, back in my high school days. They had promised me a 200 point increase in my SAT score, and that plain just never materialized.
GoatMan
was here!
was here!