It fell on newton...
- NS
- I like pants
- Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 10:05 pm
- Status: Pants
- Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
- Contact:
- mirkosp
- The Absolute Mudman
- Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 6:24 am
- Status: (」・ワ・)」(⊃・ワ・)⊃
- Location: Gallarate (VA), Italy
- Contact:
- dokidoki
- c0d3 m0nk3y
- Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 7:42 pm
- Status: BLEEP BLOOP!
- Location: doki doki space
- Contact:
If it ever comes out.mirkosp wrote:Avisynth 3.0 will be Windows and Linux, so...
- Kionon
- I ♥ the 80's
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2001 10:13 pm
- Status: Ayukawa MODoka.
- Location: I wonder if you know how they live in Tokyo... DRIFT, DRIFT, DRIFT
- Contact:
- Bauzi
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 12:48 pm
- Status: Under High Voltage
- Location: Austria (uhm the other country without kangaroos^^)
- Contact:
Still makes me wonder why Mac seams to be so present in video industrial for me. I dislike it just for the sake of this two huge lacks.Douggie wrote:the lack of AviSynth. And even with that not available I thought lossless would be an option, but there's nothing with the strength or speed like Lagarith or Huffyuv - at least not free. I recall ishtori had a good lossless codec, but that one costs around $100 which is kinda a turn off.
You can find me on YT under "Bauzi514". Subscribe to never miss my AMV releases. 
- Willen
- Now in Hi-Def!
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 1:50 am
- Status: Melancholy
- Location: SOS-Dan HQ
Production houses like Macs for the reason that the hardware is supported by the same company that produces the OS (and software). And vice-versa. From way back, Macs have supported video (and audio) editing. Not to mention graphics and image editing/production. Go to any advertising agency or department and nearly all their work is done on a Mac. Momentum does play a factor since a lot of the pioneers of the industry started doing these things on a Mac, and then taught others on a Mac, etc. Of course, the accounting side is using Windows...Bauzi wrote:Still makes me wonder why Mac seams to be so present in video industrial for me. I dislike it just for the sake of this two huge lacks.Douggie wrote:the lack of AviSynth. And even with that not available I thought lossless would be an option, but there's nothing with the strength or speed like Lagarith or Huffyuv - at least not free. I recall ishtori had a good lossless codec, but that one costs around $100 which is kinda a turn off.
As for the 'lacks' of the Mac platform, professional video editing and production don't need them. Professional gear adhere to fairly common industry-wide standards. And any company introducing new equipment, if using a new codec or protocol, should damned well make sure that they provide new plug-ins for existing programs or an all-in-one solution.
Up until a few years ago, MPEG-2 wasn't even in the professional editing pipeline until the final step: content delivery (broadcast or pressed media; i.e. DVDs). Remember, all the flavors of MPEG and many other popular digital media codecs were intended for use as a playback only solution. This is why the guides suggest decoding DVD footage (MPEG-2) to lossless of uncompressed formats. And professionals don't (or at least shouldn't) need to convert formats -- THEY SHOULD HAVE THE DAMNED ORIGINAL MASTERS TO WORK WITH!
- Kionon
- I ♥ the 80's
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2001 10:13 pm
- Status: Ayukawa MODoka.
- Location: I wonder if you know how they live in Tokyo... DRIFT, DRIFT, DRIFT
- Contact:
- guy07
- Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2003 1:28 pm
- Status: Back in beard.
- Location: T.O.
- Contact:
- LittleAtari
- Call Me Moneybagz
- Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 10:23 pm
I'm switching to a Mac soon for school and I'll be using Final Cut Pro and After Effects so I'm going to have to say, yes we do need a MacAmvApp. It seems like Macs are becoming more popular too. I'm seeing more Mac users pop out every single day. It's like a disease... So might as well get it going now.






