Why tying "video quality" to frame size and rate is dumb.

[Niotex]

Clearly we all need to move to RED Epic 617.

[Chiikaboom]

ohhh you guys

[Castor Troy]

Resolutions are going to get so high to the point where we can see the pores and bacteria on people's faces.

[Ikore]

This thread reminds me that I'm going to make a "nostalgia" version of my next video witch will be a fuzzy mpeg-1 at 320x240 resolution, that has been run through a capture card (at high quality).

sweet dude

[Pas]

Quoted Image converted to link:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... CAMERA.png

Clearly we all need to move to RED Epic 617.

That's weak Nio. I'll show you... TRUE SCALE.

[Niotex]

Pas my boy I think you earned that kitten we talked about

[Nya-chan Production]

You need 720p to get a 10.

,,|,,

[hasteroth]

Pas my boy I think you earned that kitten we talked about

And he get's a cookie.

[Brad]

Wait wait wait wait.......











what?

[Willen]

Sony Vegas Pro 9 supports RED ONE™ files and 4K workflow. Get it now, bitches!

At any rate, I guess this will be the situation until Blu-ray sources become the norm. And then we'll be complaining about the quality of the original source (e.g. Air, Funi's DBZ, etc.). Those first DVDs look pretty crappy nowadays, but compared to the VHS versions...

Actually, I've thought of doing a video and making it 'old school' looking by outputting my final video to VHS and video capturing it back, the converting it unfiltered to some modern distro format. Kinda like how some recent Hollywood movies are made with modern equipment but manipulated to look like a vintage movie.