Please note that I said, "attacking", not "flaming" 8)Pierrot Le Fou wrote:Read my post again. I wasn't attacking anyone. I was simply stating my
preference where subs are considered. Please don't confuse that with
flaming.
My interpretation of your post was that it was a subtle dig at Omni for using subbed footage to make vids, while appearing to chide Cat for flaming him.
I admit that it is ambiguous enough to be interpreted in other ways, enabling you to efficiently defend against accusations like mine in my previous post.
If my interpretation was indeed correct, I must congratulate you on making such a subtle, yet razor sharp zing, even if I disagree with the intent. If you insist on denying that interpretation, that is your perogative.
