When your northbridge is running that fast, of course you'll see a differenceZ3r01 wrote:HT has definately made a positive impact. Just using Windows is a lot smoother than before, and it's not smoother in the sense that it's just a raw speed increase. I'm starting to see what they mean when they said "cinematic computing" but using Windows, that's a bit farfetched isn't it?!

Yes, you need registered memory. It's more expensive, but not by *that* much. I have registered on my dual-Athlon and it's not an Opteron.Z3r01 wrote:If you plan on dual opterons Pwolf, do a bit of research, I originally wanted to, but it requires "special" registered RAM, which differs from the standard DDR RAM and as expected costs more.
Correct.Z3r01 wrote:As for Athlon 64's and their sockets, I might as well point a few things out that confused me at first.
Athlon 64's come in 754 and 939 pins
Athlon FX's come in 939 and 940 pins
Opteron's come in 940 pins only.
Sort of correct. The main problem I've seen with most people (and sites like newegg) is that they call all 754's "Clawhammer core." This is incorrect. The core (claw/drill/sledge) is based on the cache size, *not* the package used (754/939/940).Z3r01 wrote:The 754 pin Athlon 64's are single channel DDR with a 1MB L2 cache (Clawhammer core)
With the exception of the Newcastle core which is 512KB and clocked higher, I guess this might intrude on would be overclockers. I think this is an attempt at cutting production costs, seems like a step backwards to me
It seems that most sites/people regard the name based on the package type, but that's incorrect. A Sledge 754 and a Sledge 939 are effectively the same die with the same cache size and thus both sledge...not claw and drill per se.
Also there is an Athlon-64 with 256k of L2 and that's the appropriate die for "Clawhammer."
Could be Drill or Sledge. Depends on the cache-size.Z3r01 wrote:The 939 pin Athlon 64's are dual channel DDR with a 512KB L2 cache
(Clawhammer core?)
Yes.Z3r01 wrote:The 939 pin Athlon FX are dual channel DDR with a 1MB L2 cache
(Sledgehammer core)
Sledge and yes, effectively an Opteron ~ FX (similarly priced if you look carefully) except for a few modifications to run in MP and such. This, I imagine, is a marketing tactic to target certain segments (i.e. servers).Z3r01 wrote:The 940 pin Opteron are dual channel(?) DDR with a 1MB L2 cache
(Claw/Sledgehammer core?)
I don't know a great deal about these, but from what I know and what I'd expect, I'm guessing these are "modded Athlon FX's", similar difference between the Athlon XP and Athlon MP, perhaps dwchang can clarify? Again these require that expensive registered DDR RAM, and obviously a dual processor or greater board (which I had a hell of a time locating)
Define "in the know." If you mean I work there then yeah you're rightZ3r01 wrote:There are probably minor errors, but I hear dwchang is "in the know"So feel free to correct me


In any case, my advice Pwolf is to wait for the 939's to come down in price and then buy them. We've publically announced that we won't be producing any more 754's after 2005. Obviously they will still work, but in terms of upgradeability, it would be prudent to buy a 939 so you can still use the same motherboard and such later down the line...assuming you keep the MB and so on.