You might as well accept it!

Neko116 · Post by **Neko116** » Sat Jun 05, 2004 4:20 pm

no seriously, i'm pretty embarrassed of em... the only one that was slightly good at parts was my 2nd one. I have to resort to wmm.... it sucks...badly

fyrtenheimer · Post by **fyrtenheimer** » Sun Jun 06, 2004 6:26 am

..what's wrong with wmm

ari made a vid (..actually about 90) using that program that's kicking assss right now.

)v(ajin Koji · Post by **)v(ajin Koji** » Sun Jun 06, 2004 7:49 am

fyrtenheimer wrote:..what's wrong with wmm

ari made a vid (..actually about 90) using that program that's kicking assss right now.

x2

It's how you use the program and its limitations that makes AMVs good.

Pyle · Post by **Pyle** » Sun Jun 06, 2004 6:48 pm

Neko116 wrote:no seriously, i'm pretty embarrassed of em... the only one that was slightly good at parts was my 2nd one. I have to resort to wmm.... it sucks...badly

WMM is pretty much the same as all other editing software, just has less fancy effects and no overlays. It also has a very user friendly interface

bubblehead · Post by **bubblehead** » Sun Jun 06, 2004 7:09 pm

ah, but it's buggy, not frame accurate, linear, and only has limited export options. While it's possible to make a good AMV with it, I don't particularly like it. Also, on my last vid, there was an extra frame on my exported version that didn't show up in the preview.

fyrtenheimer · Post by **fyrtenheimer** » Mon Jun 07, 2004 7:40 am

wow! that stuff can happen in premiere too!!

hackerzc · Post by **hackerzc** » Mon Jun 07, 2004 8:32 am

DDramone wrote:yeah, i was really dissapointed when my vids were gettin below averege scores (im pretty new). wish someone left an opinion.

Don't pay attention to ratings and what not.... no seriously, they really mean nothing. Just do what you like and in time you will find your own way.