Love

Tab. · Post by **Tab.** » Thu Oct 23, 2003 3:45 pm

Thanks for the in depth explanation. My point stands, that the reason we're here is because those who's oxytocin levels were high among our ancestors reproduced more and more successfully, and those who's weren't, didn't. Yet, now that we've grown a frontal lobe we don't need pleasure reenforcement to get us to do things like bond and reproduce. You're right in saying that it'd be over estimating the race to think that we're not slaves to emotions anymore. However, we can procreate and evolve in such a way that we would not be, giving more brain to thinking, and less to drives. That's an interesting thought, if a bit cold and boring according to our popular perception of emotions.

Flint the Dwarf · Post by **Flint the Dwarf** » Thu Oct 23, 2003 4:06 pm

motemote wrote:So, basically, from what I can intrepret from posts.... Misty is a lesbian?

What? You suck.

MistyCaldwell · Post by **MistyCaldwell** » Thu Oct 23, 2003 4:08 pm

flint_the_dwarf wrote:Alright, now to state my opinion (after Misty's long and chemical induced "rant")...

No chemicals were used in the making of this post ^_^

motemote hacked:

So, basically, from what I can intrepret from posts.... Misty is a lesbian?

Um what? *checks own post*

nothing there...

Lord, can people leave me out of their odd fantasies? First blue hair fetishes, now this.....

motemote · Post by **motemote** » Thu Oct 23, 2003 4:21 pm

Not a fantasy, dear me no, I don't stalk people online like the denizens of this forum.
However, after reading your outlook on love and life and everything I just thought you would probably be a lesbian.
Guess I'm wrong.

Tab. · Post by **Tab.** » Thu Oct 23, 2003 4:25 pm

Philosophy like that comes when our logical mind tries to reflect on and rationalize the emotional desires that are strong enough to override it. The introduction of a mind capable of looking at itself has done strange things to our brand of beings.
That's a whole other issue. Why did we advance and why/how did it happen so quickly? Maybe God made us that way. Maybe aliens genetically altered us. Maybe Manas/Mind manifested itself as the higher brain as it descended into being during this round. Who knows.

Lyrs · Post by **Lyrs** » Thu Oct 23, 2003 4:25 pm

Misty would make a hawt lesbian nevertheless.

Lyrs · Post by **Lyrs** » Thu Oct 23, 2003 4:31 pm

. Wife 1.0 .

MEMORANDUM RE: Computer Software Warning Last year a friend of mine upgraded GirlFriend 1.0 to Wife 1.0 and found that it's a memory hog leaving very little system resources for other applications. He is only now noticing that Wife 1.0 also is spawning Child-Processes which are further consuming valuable resources. No mention of this particular phenomena was included in the productbrochure or the documentation, though other users have informed him that this is to be expected due to the nature of the application. Not only that, Wife 1.0 installs itself such that it is always launched at system initialization where it can monitor all other system activity. He's finding that some applications such as PokerNight 8.3, BeerBash 2.5, and PubNight 7.0 are no longer able to run in the system at all, crashing the system when selected (even though they always worked fine before). At installation, Wife 1.0 provides no option as to the installation of undesired Plug-Ins such as MotherInLaw 55.8 and BrotherInLaw Beta release. Also, system performance seems to diminish with each passing day. Some features he'd like to see in the upcoming Wife 2.0. - A 'Don't remind me again' button - Minimize button - An install shield feature that allows Wife 2.0 to be installed with the option to uninstall at anytime without the loss of cache and other system resources. - An option to run the network driver in promiscuous mode which would allow the systems hardware probe feature to be much more useful. I myself decided to avoid all of the headaches associated with Wife 1.0 by sticking with GirlFriend 2.0. Even here, however, I found many problems. Apparently you cannot install GirlFriend 2.0 on top of GirlFriend 1.0. You must uninstall GirlFriend 1.0 first. Other users say this is a long standing bug which I should have been aware of. Apparently the versions of GirlFriend have conflicts over shared use of the I/O port. You think they would have fixed such a stupid bug by now. To make matters worse, The uninstall program for GirlFriend 1.0 doesn't work very well leaving undesirable traces of the application in the system. Another thing that sucks - all versions of GirlFriend continually pop up little annoying messages about the advantages of upgrading to Wife 1.0 ***** BUG WARNING ******** Wife 1.0 has an undocumented bug. If you try to install Mistress 1.1 before uninstalling Wife 1.0, Wife 1.0 will delete MSMoney files before doing the uninstall itself. Then Mistress 1.1 will refuse to install, claiming insufficient resources. *** BUG WORK-AROUNDS *************** To avoid the above bug, try installing Mistress 1.1 on a different system and never run any file transfer applications such as LapLink 6.0. Also, beware of similar shareware applications that have beenknown to carry viruses that may affect Wife 1.0. Another solution would be to run Mistress 1.0 via a UseNet provider under an anonymous name. Here again, beware of the viruses which can accidentally be downloaded from the UseNet.

http://www.drunkcow.com/content/420.html

/end spam

MistyCaldwell · Post by **MistyCaldwell** » Thu Oct 23, 2003 4:39 pm

motemote wrote:Not a fantasy, dear me no, I don't stalk people online like the denizens of this forum.
However, after reading your outlook on love and life and everything I just thought you would probably be a lesbian.
Guess I'm wrong.

ahh I see.

I guess I should have added more of the following:

OMGROFLMAO Love is boy bands, valentines day cards, bishounen guys, and oh my god I love chocolate except when I get upset and eat a gallan of Cherry Garcia.

El Banana · Post by **El Banana** » Thu Oct 23, 2003 5:19 pm

Touché.

Kamoc · Post by **Kamoc** » Thu Oct 23, 2003 8:56 pm

MistyCaldwell wrote:I have no idea, it was just a small example I used and cause Kamoc didn't understand what I meant, it's become the focus of the topic

and what if your example was wrong?

you're acting as though the 'love' conversation is completely different from your little vegan romp, yet somehow you were the one who magically saw the connecting line between the two.

oh no i'm going offtopic get the hose

the human mind is a puzzle. spend to much time looking at the individual pieces and you'll never see the entire picture. and what do you want? a world where everything is white?

or where everything is clear?

besides, if happiness were tangible, i'm sure it'd be a glade air-freshener. they got the little light bulb on them that turns on when the other lights go off, it's fucking amazing.