The Attitudes Of AMV Creators, Take 2

Nappy · Post by **Nappy** » Sun Mar 16, 2003 10:49 pm

Kusoyaro wrote:SpPANDA is such a [something something something]. Shut up. SHUT UP.

That's all I care to say on the matter.

[MOD467: Post modded due to its personal attacking nature.]

Too bad it was edited such attitudes are the basis of this thread ._.

RadicalEd0 · Post by **RadicalEd0** » Sun Mar 16, 2003 10:51 pm

im still tryin to figure out how it was modded twice in a row by the same mod :|...

Nappy · Post by **Nappy** » Sun Mar 16, 2003 10:55 pm

RadicalEd0 wrote:im still tryin to figure out how it was modded twice in a row by the same mod :|...

Don't think about it too much you'll just get put down by the overlords :O

Plus I think alot of ppl don't understand why they couldn't do it (like me) ._.

RadicalEd0 · Post by **RadicalEd0** » Sun Mar 16, 2003 11:05 pm

the mods explained it before and I'm familiar enough with phpbb to know. If a post is edited by the same person more than once a little tag shows up at the bottom saying "this post was edited by >>name<< at >>time<<"

Ya.. theyll prolly call me for making a big deal out of an invisomod issue like I did before with that guys name showing up... meh. Its just so scandalous tho :o I'm a sucker for unsolved mysteries and hidden knowledge :\

[MOD467: Did it ever occur to you that Kusoyaro might not be a mod? Some food for thought...]

RadicalEd0 · Post by **RadicalEd0** » Sun Mar 16, 2003 11:12 pm

Never said he was a mod, not once. I wasnt even inferring that. Oh, I made a joke about it by saying felt bad for yourself, but that was just that, a joke.
I was pointing out how the MOD: part of the post said something totally different and more aggressively stated one minute and then was toned down to just "edited for personal attack" the next minute; thus, it was modded twice in a row.
Don't make me go into more detail, like I said then you'll all just get mad at me for making a big smoking deal out of another invisomod issue.

[MOD467: *sigh* No, not mad, just exasperated. The reason *I* modded the post from a harsh reprimand to one of a gentler nature is because after some thought, I realized that I might be fanning more flames than I was putting out.]

OtakuOutpost · Post by **OtakuOutpost** » Sun Mar 16, 2003 11:45 pm

Well, I'm glad the Mod did tone it down. The Mods are supposed to be of upstanding character and not sink to lower ones.

And did I hear correctly that SpPanda got banned?

--Tony

RadicalEd0 · Post by **RadicalEd0** » Sun Mar 16, 2003 11:49 pm

RadicalEd0 wrote:The reason *I* modded the post from a harsh reprimand to one of a gentler nature is because after some thought, I realized that I might be fanning more flames than I was putting out

thats cool, but I thought the same person couldn't edit the same post more than once

which is what I've been saying this whole time

[MOD467: No, they can't edit their own post more than once.]

Nappy · Post by **Nappy** » Mon Mar 17, 2003 12:17 am

so then a mod modded a mod for flaming kuso, who was flaming sppanda O_O I'm confussed @_@

And yes sppanda was banned again, and linked to this thread as the reason which he couldn't even read as he was banned..... This happened shortly after kuso's post hmm.... :\

OtakuOutpost · Post by **OtakuOutpost** » Mon Mar 17, 2003 12:26 am

If this thread is why he got banned, I don't understand.

After the mod reopened his previous topic, he didn't do anything.

I'm confused.

--Tony

RadicalEd0 · Post by **RadicalEd0** » Mon Mar 17, 2003 12:27 am

kuso flamed sppanda, mod 467 modded him harshly, then re-modded the post with a more gentle demeanor. Tis all :\