How many people will you have to meet to find your soulmate?

EarthCurrent · Post by **EarthCurrent** » Wed Jun 04, 2003 1:26 am

I've already met "the one"

...now all I need to do is dispose of the boyfriend....

how wonderfully duplicitous of you...

ohho...don't you know it...

wait...your being sarcastic aren't you...

never

bah...why am I stuck with a sarcastic conscience?

most assuredly luck of the draw

chaoticstormbringer · Post by **chaoticstormbringer** » Wed Jun 04, 2003 2:40 am

Nah because just about everything those two have told us was actually true and did happen. sadly enough. I remember those days of when every thursday the group meeting came to be (people from the theosophical society). I just locked myself away in the computer room because my mother's spiritual energy is like... way up there.

Believe me, she's written a book on this channelling stuff. Automatic writing it was. Now heres the thing. Mum is a very poor typer, more like the index finger typer and such. When she does automatic typing, her eyes are closed and she is using all her fingers and is typing about probably 200 big words a minute. yeah go figure, i'm still trying to figure it out myself.

Anyway, a soulmate is not really the one that you are looking for. If you want the one go to brazil or italy

but, oh what the hell i hate giving insight... go figure it out for yourselves, fate will join you up when you are ready or not, just don't waste your lives searching for it otherwise I will never be able to see newer AMVs

Tab. · Post by **Tab.** » Wed Jun 04, 2003 4:33 am

oh wait
you're that guy I pmed about the theosophical society arent you
or are you
wtf is going on

Kamoc · Post by **Kamoc** » Wed Jun 04, 2003 3:47 pm

everything.

look, i'm earthcurrent
8) no you're not, shut up

oh fuck off

dude

cratchett

pick on the rusafra

cambride is a dick

DOWN WITH CANADA

EarthCurrent · Post by **EarthCurrent** » Wed Jun 04, 2003 4:34 pm

Kamoc wrote:everything.

look, i'm earthcurrent
8) no you're not, shut up
oh fuck off
dude
cratchett
pick on the rusafra
cambride is a dick
DOWN WITH CANADA

how delightfully droll.

Stoic · Post by **Stoic** » Wed Jun 04, 2003 4:58 pm

You have to meet 1 American single females who are between 18 and 26 years old.

Damn... that means any bitch will do right?

SarahtheBoring · Post by **SarahtheBoring** » Wed Jun 04, 2003 5:43 pm

lol, basically.

ladydx - well, somebody in that relationship has to screw in the lightbulbs and tie people's shoes.

As for soulmates - the "What if they live on the other side of the world? Or they died as a child?" was my first reaction to this whole idea, when I first heard it as a kid. That's my first problem with it.

My other problem with it is that it simplifies EVERYTHING in human interaction down to one question - "Are we soulmates? Y/N" - and ignores all the other factors that go into a relationship. Which I think does people injustice. Life is complicated and messy, and I love that. 8)

Nestorath69 · Post by **Nestorath69** » Wed Jun 04, 2003 6:34 pm

Your probability coefficient: 0.

Damn.

Your standards are too high! If you'd like to include your email address, we will send you step-by-step instructions on how to place your head between your knees and kiss your ass goodbye... Because you're a lifelong bachelor.

Yay.

chaoticstormbringer · Post by **chaoticstormbringer** » Wed Jun 04, 2003 7:01 pm

yeah i'm that dude

pretty much i've seen the works of it

emp|typ|athetic · Post by **emp|typ|athetic** » Wed Jun 04, 2003 8:04 pm

SarahtheBoring wrote:As for soulmates - the "What if they live on the other side of the world? Or they died as a child?" was my first reaction to this whole idea, when I first heard it as a kid. That's my first problem with it.

My other problem with it is that it simplifies EVERYTHING in human interaction down to one question - "Are we soulmates? Y/N" - and ignores all the other factors that go into a relationship. Which I think does people injustice. Life is complicated and messy, and I love that. 8)

actually, i think that by 'soulmate' they're not referring the magical fairy land term, i.e. he's the 'yin' to your 'yang', you were together in your past lives etc.
i think its just a common hollywood-overexploited term which, if you believe the statistics, means 'the person you're gonna be miserably married to for 15 years until divorce, alimony payments, and a fat custody suit do you apart'.

not that's how i would define it for myself.
in fact i personally see it as entirely obsolete in this day and age,
but im all demoralized and postmodernish.
Cocytus YO