My 2 Cents.

DemonicTsuchiya · Post by **DemonicTsuchiya** » Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:20 pm

bigger sigs on this part of the website.

trythil · Post by **trythil** » Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:41 pm

No. This has been discussed time and again -- use the forum search tool to find out why.

Perhaps you'll get lucky and find some of jbone's old posts that describe his thoughts on the mental disabilities of people who feel the need to express themselves with large signatures. I won't express agreement or disagreement on that subject, but they're really quite funny.

SnhKnives · Post by **SnhKnives** » Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:56 pm

trythil wrote:No.

x2

Farlo · Post by **Farlo** » Fri Apr 29, 2005 2:24 am

zomg i too could use a sig thats 9660451641x31649419 to express my artistic abilities

Org Profile · Post by **Otohiko** » Fri Apr 29, 2005 5:24 pm

The key question here is "why?"

bum · Post by **bum** » Fri Apr 29, 2005 9:03 pm

Well, being able to use one 80x tall image would be nice.

pen-pen2002 · Post by **pen-pen2002** » Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:32 pm

bum wrote:Well, being able to use one 80x tall image would be nice.

I don't know. There are more important things to code and we don't want to encourage large pictures. If someone wants one for a new release or something then they can go through the trouble of making it work.

DemonicTsuchiya · Post by **DemonicTsuchiya** » Sat Apr 30, 2005 7:30 pm

i mean like 400width and 120height thats not bad is it???

dokool · Post by **dokool** » Sun May 01, 2005 1:39 am

BDXRdemon wrote:i mean like 400width and 120height thats not bad is it???

Yes it is. Stop feeling the need to compensate for penile length via your sig and bitch about something constructive.

godix · Post by **godix** » Sun May 01, 2005 10:34 pm

dokool wrote:
BDXRdemon wrote:Stop feeling the need to compensate for penile length via your sig and bitch about something constructive.

What should we bitch about? Bigger avatars?