THIS THREAD IS FOR CALM DISCUSSION OF RECENT TRANSGRESSIONS

JaddziaDax · Post by **JaddziaDax** » Mon Feb 19, 2007 4:34 pm

Otohiko wrote:I'm glad they were all willing to listen, discuss and address questions; that's what we've been looking for here.

x2

Autraya · Post by **Autraya** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 3:17 am

Apparently the person in question (bp27) who was so bad in early posts is now a different person according to the names change thread.... most of your historically bad behaviour was supposedly a different person.

dokool · Post by **dokool** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 7:01 am

Autraya wrote:Apparently the person in question (bp27) who was so bad in early posts is now a different person according to the names change thread.... most of your historically bad behaviour was supposedly a different person.

Not necessarily, unless you can prove through IP addresses.

Autraya · Post by **Autraya** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 7:24 am

No I can't but... although their actual language and phrasing has changed and they are using less of

if you catch my drift as katie said they could be the same person as ch3slina. * shrugs* I don't know, but having seen that thread I thought I'd point it out, some time it's better to give people the benefit of the doubt. And I wouldn't like to see a memeber who has taken over someones profile be (for discussions sake) punished for things they didn't do.

Autraya · Post by **Autraya** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 7:27 am

srry double post.
I should have said for some historical actions they didn't commit.
I'm not going defend their actions by the way I just think all aspects should be considered

JaddziaDax · Post by **JaddziaDax** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 8:49 am

Autraya wrote:No I can't but... although their actual language and phrasing has changed and they are using less of if you catch my drift as katie said they could be the same person as ch3slina. * shrugs* I don't know, but having seen that thread I thought I'd point it out, some time it's better to give people the benefit of the doubt. And I wouldn't like to see a memeber who has taken over someones profile be (for discussions sake) punished for things they didn't do.

im still not sure about that...

and changing their name in a name change request will also change their name on past posts...

wurpess · Post by **wurpess** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 4:26 pm

Autraya wrote:Apparently the person in question (bp27) who was so bad in early posts is now a different person according to the names change thread.... most of your historically bad behaviour was supposedly a different person.

I don't know. Even if it was a different person in the past, that doesn't excuse recent actions and rudeness. And besides, if you look at their org profile, it talks about recent events as well as the past events we were upset about using the same kind of words. And it links to recent posts as well as the past ones that were in their sig at one point. So I still think it was the same person in all instances. Whether or not they're also Chelsealina (sp?) is a different story.

Cornwiggle · Post by **Cornwiggle** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 4:28 pm

Shouldn't Godix be unbanned by now?

Orwell · Post by **Orwell** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 4:31 pm

NEVER FORGET!

(It was a week long ban.)

Autraya · Post by **Autraya** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 4:45 pm

Sorry I should have mentioned the reasons stated for changeing their name was that she had now taken over her cousins account and hence wanted a different name because they are different people.
I just realised how naive of me this sounds hehehe.

Now for 4 cents worth (2+2 =4

)on the Godix op thread is that I noticed several of the people who were, and I'll use the word "duped" here as I can't think of an alternative. Have english as a second language and are not as good at it as, say, people like me (See I speak occa the native language of all aussies and it barely resembles the english language at all! lol sorry), the were ridiculed for poor communication/misunderstandings and I would think that he and others should have taken that into consideration when dealing out all 1 ops or having a go at people. I work with many people with english as a second language and yes sometimes it's hard, but if I ever treated them the way others here have I would have been sacked long ago, remember that little thing called E&D? That is my one beef about all of this; some members need to be more tollerant and it might have prevented the blow up from escalating in the first place (but I do agree that it was inevitable).
I would like to note; This does not excuse flaming by BP27 at all, you can throw the forum rules at others, but then cannot hide behind them as a shield because your 'english' is not so good. *sighs* I'm not saying that this is happening either I thought I'd just say it before some one else does.

I'd like to say thank you to downwithpants this thread is a good idea I just hope it doesn't go 'round in circles. And I think that some valid points have been raised I just hope that more of those who rushed to Godix's defence use this oportunity.