avatars for god's sakes!!

Locked
User avatar
Radical_Yue
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 8:45 pm
Status: The flamer with heart of gold~<3
Org Profile

Post by Radical_Yue » Wed Oct 11, 2006 1:49 pm

As long as Gir continues to dance, I have no quarrel. 8-)

User avatar
Otohiko
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 8:32 pm
Org Profile

Post by Otohiko » Wed Oct 11, 2006 1:59 pm

You'd be surprised what you can put in the limited space. I certainly have had a lot of different stuff here over the last 3 years, and I never felt all that restricted.

That said, yes, I'm a graphics whore and would abuse a limitless forum. Which goes to say that it's probably a good thing that the .org keeps me constrained in that... :roll:
The Birds are using humanity in order to throw something terrifying at this green pig. And then what happens to us all later, that’s simply not important to them…

User avatar
DeinReich
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 10:40 am
Location: College
Org Profile

Post by DeinReich » Wed Oct 11, 2006 2:59 pm

120x120 avatars? Can someone say Donator Option?
Image

User avatar
Moonie
Give me some candy!
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2003 9:37 am
Status: HP:11900 Strength: 940 Gold:60000 MP:1200
Location: Garland, Tx
Org Profile

Post by Moonie » Wed Oct 11, 2006 3:07 pm

SOAD2k8 wrote:120x120 avatars? Can someone say Donator Option?
hehe
120x120 isnt bad if you compress it good

My current avatar is 5kb
And the 120x120 version 1s 10kb ^_^

I vote for 120x120!!!

It probally wont happen though... :(
ImageImageImage
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Orwell
godx, Son of godix
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2004 5:14 am
Location: Frying Pan. Destination: Fire.
Org Profile

Post by Orwell » Wed Oct 11, 2006 3:11 pm

SOAD2k8 wrote:120x120 avatars? Can someone say Donator Option?
Image

The avatar sizes are fine. Unobtrusive, yet large enough to contain a reasonable sized picture. Even the stater of this topic agrees.
salemshady wrote:80 by 80 pixels??!!! common!!
Besides,

Image
Latest
[Kristyrat]: Vote for Orwell
[Kristyrat]: because train conducters are dicks.
Otohiko: whereas Germans are like "god we are all so horrible, we're going to die a pointless death now."

User avatar
Jayn_Newell
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2003 6:17 pm
Org Profile

Post by Jayn_Newell » Wed Oct 11, 2006 3:21 pm

Who needs large avatars again?

Personally, I kinda wish the limit was 100x100, since that seems to be the norm in my experience, and I'd be able to use the same images I use elsewhere. But I'm not really bothered by it.

User avatar
Moonie
Give me some candy!
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2003 9:37 am
Status: HP:11900 Strength: 940 Gold:60000 MP:1200
Location: Garland, Tx
Org Profile

Post by Moonie » Wed Oct 11, 2006 3:24 pm

120x120 isnt obtrusive either
Id assume it would look something like this
Image

It fits perfectly!
A picture that pretty deserves to be larger ^_^



Radical_Yue wrote:As long as Gir continues to dance, I have no quarrel. 8-)
See Radical_Yue is up for it too as long as Gir can dance.


Vote for 120x120!
ImageImageImage
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Melanchthon
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 11:12 am
Org Profile

Post by Melanchthon » Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:10 pm

I would be happy to see avatars scrapped, if the usernames were made larger to compensate.

User avatar
Orwell
godx, Son of godix
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2004 5:14 am
Location: Frying Pan. Destination: Fire.
Org Profile

Post by Orwell » Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:23 pm

Melanchthon wrote:I would be happy to see avatars scrapped, if the usernames were made larger to compensate.
How does larger text compensate for a image?
Latest
[Kristyrat]: Vote for Orwell
[Kristyrat]: because train conducters are dicks.
Otohiko: whereas Germans are like "god we are all so horrible, we're going to die a pointless death now."

User avatar
Melanchthon
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 11:12 am
Org Profile

Post by Melanchthon » Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:41 pm

Orwell wrote:How does larger text compensate for a image?
It makes the names easier to read, is all.

Locked

Return to “Site Help & Feedback”