Oops, sorry. Meant to say Xeons.dwchang wrote:No such processor-line exists. The Pentium 4 never had the ability to dual-process. This was because Intel did not want to "compete" against their own Xeon Processors (which in reality were just larger L2 P4's). In turn, no such P4 motherobard exists.ANTDrakko wrote:My Dream Editing Box:
Dual P4 3.0 ghz each with hyperthreading
If you want dual-processing you'd go with either AMD Athlons, Opterons or Intel Xeons. If you want dual*core* you'd go with AMD Opterons, Athlon 64 X2's and Intel Pentium D's.
Bashar,
Whats wrong with a dell? I can't say that I've ever had a bad experience with Dell, not to mention you'll be hard pressed to find their certain configurations at their prices. Also, that last configuration came with a 2 year, At-Home service warranty. Even if you DO build your own system, god forbids the mobo fries or something else goes wrong in 2 years. If that ever happened to the Dell, you get it replaced at home without having to move a finger for 2 whole years. Those warrenties are freaking priceless, if you ask me.
I think that most people get really biased for some unknown reason against Dell. I challenge anyone out there to gather the required parts, provide links to each, and come up with a price. I can almost always find a better deal with a very similar configuration at Dell. Not to mention, with a warranty.
The choice is yours, though. Just don't push aside a computer because "Its a Dell". I've worked with over 50+ Dell computers and servers and had 2 problems, which were fixed personally the next day by a Dell representative.
~Seen