Memory or the CPU?

Pwolf · Post by **Pwolf** » Thu Jul 17, 2003 4:15 pm

with my 2.8ghz, on fresh restart i've been able to play an avisynth file with ivtc in realtime... then after about 5 min, it slows down.

Pwolf

dwchang · Post by **dwchang** » Thu Jul 17, 2003 4:21 pm

Pwolf wrote:with my 2.8ghz, on fresh restart i've been able to play an avisynth file with ivtc in realtime... then after about 5 min, it slows down.

Pwolf

I laugh at you single CPU folk. I have a dual 2.0 Ghz Athlon and it flies. I can even render my final outputs and go play war3 or something

. I love my computer

.

Ko Oh Yoku: I suggest getting a cheap PIII chip then. However, the money you spend seems a bit wasteful when you can get a faster computer for a few hundred dollars.

the Black Monarch · Post by **the Black Monarch** » Thu Jul 17, 2003 4:41 pm

dwchang wrote:I laugh at you single CPU folk.

I laught at you folk who can't do video editing while riding the bus, waiting in line at Burger King, etc.

Laptops are da bomb

the Black Monarch · Post by **the Black Monarch** » Thu Jul 17, 2003 4:44 pm

You know, one of these days, dw and I are going to have an actual argument over something factual instead of having a mere difference of opinion...

dwchang · Post by **dwchang** » Thu Jul 17, 2003 4:44 pm

the Black Monarch wrote:You know, one of these days, dw and I are going to have an actual argument over something factual instead of having a mere difference of opinion...

We are? News to me

alternatefutures · Post by **alternatefutures** » Thu Jul 17, 2003 5:05 pm

Awww... poor people with 800Mhz processors. Jeeze, I have a 550MHz PIII, 384MB of RAM and a 20 gig HD that I do 3D rendering and intensive After Effects on all while working with HuffYUV compressed files for 26-episode series! And my computer is located in a shed ten miles away, and there are no roads, I have to walk! It's over a hundred degrees in the winter even though there's five feet of snow on the ground, up hill both ways., AND THAT'S THE WAY I LIKES IT! You don't hear me complaining, do ya? And I can still kick your ass in Battlefield: 1942 with it, you little yippersnappers... ::spits::

dwchang · Post by **dwchang** » Thu Jul 17, 2003 5:07 pm

alternatefutures wrote:Awww... poor people with 800Mhz processors. Jeeze, I have a 550MHz PIII, 384MB of RAM and a 20 gig HD that I do 3D rendering and intensive After Effects on all while working with HuffYUV compressed files for 26-episode series! And my computer is located in a shed ten miles away, and there are no roads, I have to walk! It's over a hundred degrees in the winter even though there's five feet of snow on the ground, up hill both ways., AND THAT'S THE WAY I LIKES IT! You don't hear me complaining, do ya? And I can still kick your ass in Battlefield: 1942 with it, you little yippersnappers... ::spits::

greatness

Dannywilson · Post by **Dannywilson** » Thu Jul 17, 2003 5:44 pm

dwchang wrote:
Pwolf wrote:with my 2.8ghz, on fresh restart i've been able to play an avisynth file with ivtc in realtime... then after about 5 min, it slows down.

Pwolf

I laugh at you single CPU folk. I have a dual 2.0 Ghz Athlon and it flies. I can even render my final outputs and go play war3 or something

. I love my computer

.quote]

I dont like to do this with my dual 1.8 because it drops theencode rate on 720x480 files to less than 40 frames a second...

on 360x240's it can render at well over 100fps.

Pwolf · Post by **Pwolf** » Thu Jul 17, 2003 5:49 pm

hell if i had the money, i would have a quad system. but i spent all i have on my comp now. Which is about 10X better then what i had before. so i am perfectly content with what i have

Pwolf

dwchang · Post by **dwchang** » Thu Jul 17, 2003 6:03 pm

Dannywilson wrote:I dont like to do this with my dual 1.8 because it drops theencode rate on 720x480 files to less than 40 frames a second... on 360x240's it can render at well over 100fps.

Do you mean for Warcraft3 or when rendering the video at 100 fps? Because that's like O_o in Premiere

. I'm pretty sure you mean the game and well...I'm fine with that...I mean what else am I gonna do while rendering? I guess I could take a nap

.

Pwolf wrote:hell if i had the money, i would have a quad system. but i spent all i have on my comp now. Which is about 10X better then what i had before. so i am perfectly content with what i have

Quad eh? A quad Opteron system sounds like a good solution for you. Too bad they're insanely expensive, but then again they're for business servers and not the "Athlon 64" (which will be released in September).