H.264 codec?
- Wolfy2hk
- Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 11:36 am
- Location: Tejas
H.264 codec?
where is there a good one that doesnt have many problems with it, and dont really want to use directshow since it gives me problems sometimes
- post-it
- Joined: Wed Jul 17, 2002 5:21 am
- Status: Hunting Tanks
- Location: Chilliwack - Fishing
.. your not waisting your time with that question, your just spinning your wheels looking for a Bug-FREE x.264 -or- h.264 Codec. These are Beta Codec's that are currently being tested here. What we are doing with them is trying to figure-out why they are unstable and work around that issues. naah, your not waisting our time by asking that question 

- Zarxrax
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2001 6:37 pm
- Contact:
- Zero1
- Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2004 12:51 pm
- Location: Sheffield, United Kingdom
- Contact:
x264 has been considered stable since revision 80; it's now at 667. This means it's been stable for 2-3 years. Also the updates have slowed down which indicates it's mostly becoming feature complete, or the authors have lives and do not have time any more.
VfW is non standard and hacky, use directshow or a CLI and produce spec compliant encodes.
VfW is non standard and hacky, use directshow or a CLI and produce spec compliant encodes.
7-zip // x264 (Sharktooth's builds) // XviD (Koepi's builds) // MP4box (celtic_druid's builds) // Firefox // CCCP
-
- Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 4:50 pm
- Contact: