MKVExtractGUI question...
- Purge
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 9:18 am
- Location: Under Aus
- uchihaclan13
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:20 pm
- Purge
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 9:18 am
- Location: Under Aus
you could try the alternate solutions and use
Avidemux
http://fixounet.free.fr/avidemux/
or Super to get you a lossless avi
http://www.erightsoft.com/SUPER.html
Avidemux
http://fixounet.free.fr/avidemux/
or Super to get you a lossless avi
http://www.erightsoft.com/SUPER.html
- Qyot27
- Surreptitious fluffy bunny
- Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 12:08 pm
- Status: Creepin' between the bullfrogs
- Location: St. Pete, FL
- Contact:
It's pointless to try to repack H.264 into AVI, due to the limitations of AVI itself. The best solution is to decode it to a lossless format like HuffYUV or Lagarith, straight from the container it's in. DirectShowSource (if maintaining audio sync is required for variable framerate files) and FFmpegSource (for all other purposes) can both do this. You could also do it the hard way by extracting the .264 and using DGAVCIndex/DGAVCDec the same way you'd use DGIndex/DGDecode. Just make sure you read the notes on it first.
Unlike DirectShowSource, FFmpegSource doesn't require system codecs be installed - however, it does require the dependencies it comes with to be placed in C:\WINDOWS. It will ignore all audio and subtitle streams by default (actually, I don't think it even supports subtitles). Enabling audio is done using the atrack parameter and specifying the audio stream number (1,2,3,etc.) or -1 for the first available stream.
Unlike DirectShowSource, FFmpegSource doesn't require system codecs be installed - however, it does require the dependencies it comes with to be placed in C:\WINDOWS. It will ignore all audio and subtitle streams by default (actually, I don't think it even supports subtitles). Enabling audio is done using the atrack parameter and specifying the audio stream number (1,2,3,etc.) or -1 for the first available stream.
- post-it
- Joined: Wed Jul 17, 2002 5:21 am
- Status: Hunting Tanks
- Location: Chilliwack - Fishing
.. in case that confused you, lets break-down what was just said -- in people terms:
AVI is a fairly old standard. Video For Windows 1.1e was the last true Codec for that design. The technology is dated 1993. The limitations of AVI's are the compression technic's. AVI is "Back-To-Back BMP's" .. bit-maps. anything other than .BMP's would be considered JPG's .. and THAT is where Divx and AVI's have problems! .. to much information gets lost.
X264 & H264 are Mpeg standards. Xvid tryed to make AVI's Mpeg's and it failed. again; too much information gets lost. If you are going to work with Mpeg type Video's then doesn't it make sense to stay in the Mpeg Standards instead of trying to fill your "sandwich bag" full of "trash can sized information"??

.. the more information Mpeg has to work with, the sharper and cleaner the AMV will be.
.. the more information AVI has to work with, the less structured information it will retain; thus AVI's fall apart and become washed-out or look glossy.

.. one of the reasons why this board does not like Divx/Xvid is because the Washed-Out look is hard on the eyes! .. Editing with Garbage only created more Garbage T_T
AVI is a fairly old standard. Video For Windows 1.1e was the last true Codec for that design. The technology is dated 1993. The limitations of AVI's are the compression technic's. AVI is "Back-To-Back BMP's" .. bit-maps. anything other than .BMP's would be considered JPG's .. and THAT is where Divx and AVI's have problems! .. to much information gets lost.
X264 & H264 are Mpeg standards. Xvid tryed to make AVI's Mpeg's and it failed. again; too much information gets lost. If you are going to work with Mpeg type Video's then doesn't it make sense to stay in the Mpeg Standards instead of trying to fill your "sandwich bag" full of "trash can sized information"??

.. the more information Mpeg has to work with, the sharper and cleaner the AMV will be.
.. the more information AVI has to work with, the less structured information it will retain; thus AVI's fall apart and become washed-out or look glossy.

.. one of the reasons why this board does not like Divx/Xvid is because the Washed-Out look is hard on the eyes! .. Editing with Garbage only created more Garbage T_T
- uchihaclan13
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:20 pm
- post-it
- Joined: Wed Jul 17, 2002 5:21 am
- Status: Hunting Tanks
- Location: Chilliwack - Fishing
.. as I thought, I missed a step! ..http://www.animemusicvideos.org/phpBB/v ... hp?t=80078