Spider Man 3

guy07 · Post by **guy07** » Mon May 07, 2007 1:37 pm

... I'm not sure i want to talk about it, personally i thought there were some really good elements and CG mixed with really bad acting and writing. I mean, he WANTED to have emo hair and act like a big shot at the same time? That made no sense. And that whole part was fail.
The only cool parts were the scenes with Harry in them. He made it almost worth watching. His flying board thingy was like 100X cooler then his dads, and he had a plasma swors, that was cool. Also, the fight scenes with him in them seemed a lot better.
The worst part is this movie broke all sorts of records when it came out, i'm guessing there's a lot of people who want their ticket money back.

thoughts?

SilversLightning · Post by **SilversLightning** » Mon May 07, 2007 3:57 pm

I think they crammed too much in the time allotted and it was still a 2 and a half hour long movie. Either make it longer (which would've been unbearable) or just concentrate on ONE PLOT. There were too many things going on in the movie and it's easy to get lost. Like have Sandman or Venom have a separate movie instead of being lumped together.

and yesh that 'haircut' didn't make him cool...and neither did him attempting to dance >.< His big shot attitude wasn't very convincing and even the special effects were shaky and spazy in a lot of the parts.

the movie wasn't complete crap but it wasn't super special awesome either. still better than the crap that they've been trying to force feed down the movie consumers lately. I give it a 3/5 :/

Orwell · Post by **Orwell** » Mon May 07, 2007 4:13 pm

That 'just been raped' emotion about sums up my thoughts on spider man.

mexicanjunior · Post by **mexicanjunior** » Mon May 07, 2007 4:31 pm

I thought it was the best of the 3 Spiderman movies, I was actually not bored watching one of these for the first time...

Zarxrax · Post by **Zarxrax** » Mon May 07, 2007 4:42 pm

One of my friends who went with me said he thought it was the best one so far too, I disagree though. I thought it was still pretty good though, I loved the special effects. The acting and storyline were lacking though.

Tsunami Jones · Post by **Tsunami Jones** » Mon May 07, 2007 7:06 pm

I enjoyed it, except for what's basically already been mentioned (that it was moderately bloated, etc.)

I was horribly disappointed that they didn't kill Mary Jane

guy07 · Post by **guy07** » Tue May 08, 2007 10:27 am

that would of been cool, lol, if the car fell and they didn't reach her in time ... then it would of been a good movie

SilversLightning · Post by **SilversLightning** » Tue May 08, 2007 10:35 am

I know MJ should've died five times in that part and never did :/ booo....
but I guess the film people want Spidey to actually marry her

Kitsuner · Post by **Kitsuner** » Tue May 08, 2007 12:34 pm

DivineQueenYeiweh wrote:I know MJ should've died five times in that part and never did :/ booo....

Yeiweh haet mexicanjunior

dwchang · Post by **dwchang** » Tue May 08, 2007 1:05 pm

You mean Spectacular Spiderman Issue 200, the Movie?

Overall I enjoyed it since it resolved the main plot point common in all three movies (Harry/Peter), but like everyone, thought it was way too bloated. You could've cut Gwen Stacy and Venom from the movie entirely and it would've been the same plot, and better.

The second is still the best one though.