avatars for god's sakes!!

This forum is for help with this web site. Please read the FAQ and then search this forum before asking questions here; most likely the question you are about to ask has already been answered.

Postby Jayn_Newell » Wed Oct 11, 2006 3:21 pm

Who needs large avatars again?

Personally, I kinda wish the limit was 100x100, since that seems to be the norm in my experience, and I'd be able to use the same images I use elsewhere. But I'm not really bothered by it.
<a href="http://www.animemusicvideos.org/members/members_videoinfo.php?v=112826">Image</a>
<a href="http://www.animemusicvideos.org/members/members_videoinfo.php?v=126460">Image</a>
User avatar
Jayn_Newell
 
Joined: 13 Sep 2003

Postby Moonie » Wed Oct 11, 2006 3:24 pm

120x120 isnt obtrusive either
Id assume it would look something like this
Image

It fits perfectly!
A picture that pretty deserves to be larger ^_^




Radical_Yue wrote:As long as Gir continues to dance, I have no quarrel. 8-)


See Radical_Yue is up for it too as long as Gir can dance.


Vote for 120x120!
ImageImageImage
ImageImageImage
User avatar
Moonie
Give me some candy!
 
Joined: 17 Aug 2003
Location: Garland, Tx
Status: HP:11900 Strength: 940 Gold:60000 MP:1200

Postby Melanchthon » Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:10 pm

I would be happy to see avatars scrapped, if the usernames were made larger to compensate.
User avatar
Melanchthon
 
Joined: 02 Sep 2004

Postby Orwell » Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:23 pm

Melanchthon wrote:I would be happy to see avatars scrapped, if the usernames were made larger to compensate.


How does larger text compensate for a image?
Latest
[Kristyrat]: Vote for Orwell
[Kristyrat]: because train conducters are dicks.
Otohiko: whereas Germans are like "god we are all so horrible, we're going to die a pointless death now."
User avatar
Orwell
godx, Son of godix
 
Joined: 06 Jan 2004
Location: Frying Pan. Destination: Fire.

Postby Melanchthon » Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:41 pm

Orwell wrote:How does larger text compensate for a image?

It makes the names easier to read, is all.
User avatar
Melanchthon
 
Joined: 02 Sep 2004

Postby salemshady » Wed Oct 11, 2006 6:13 pm

madbunny wrote:It's strange..

There are words in your post, but all I can translate them as are inarticulate whiny noises.

Perhaps if you were able to articulate an actual REASON why the site should change you'd be making sense. As it is, the closest I can get is.. "this site isn't like other sites...wryyyy?"

perhaps you are a computer whiz kid who spends too much time on the computer. some of us dont spend half as much time as u do .. and so for us out going people.. it is very inconvinient to look around for pictures for their avatars that fit the bill.. let alone make one using photobucket or whatever the hell it is!
User avatar
salemshady
 
Joined: 01 Sep 2006
Location: toronto, canada

Postby salemshady » Wed Oct 11, 2006 6:15 pm

moonie211 wrote:
Minion wrote:one of the things i love about the org is it's avatar and sig policy. no cluttering


Minion...

You know you can't resist a 120x120... ^_^

Image


damn straight!
User avatar
salemshady
 
Joined: 01 Sep 2006
Location: toronto, canada

Postby madbunny » Wed Oct 11, 2006 6:53 pm

salemshady wrote:
madbunny wrote:It's strange..

There are words in your post, but all I can translate them as are inarticulate whiny noises.

Perhaps if you were able to articulate an actual REASON why the site should change you'd be making sense. As it is, the closest I can get is.. "this site isn't like other sites...wryyyy?"

perhaps you are a computer whiz kid who spends too much time on the computer. some of us dont spend half as much time as u do .. and so for us out going people.. it is very inconvinient to look around for pictures for their avatars that fit the bill.. let alone make one using photobucket or whatever the hell it is!



Haha, where to start here.

Ok, lets just ignore that resizing a picture isn't what most people call 'highly demanding' in terms of mental skill. Lets also ignore that photobucket use is free and consists of essentially four mouse clicks to use. (log in, select picture, upload).

I didn't know that outgoing people had it so hard. Sorry about that all you outgoing people.

What I was getting at, is that you didn't really make a point in your first post, other than to complain that this sites avatars are smaller than other sites. This is something that surely, many people have already noticed. I'm also willing to stake a bet that 'some' of the mods here even have accounts on other sites that allow larger avatars.

What I was getting at is that you didn't give the administrators a good reason to change it. Without a reason, why would they mess with something that essentially is of little consequence?

Try this on for size:

Dear forum administrators,

I've noticed that the avatars size limit on this forum is very constrictive.
I would like to see it changed for the following reasons
a)
b)
c)
etc...

The reason that I think this would make the forum a better place is:
1)
2)
3)

I'm sure many users will agree with me, and if its made known as a member donation benefit perhaps it will even enhance the site.


etc... etc... and so on.



Instead what I see is... "Whaaaaaah! I want a bigger avatar, that site over there lets us use them! Why can't I have one?"
Build a man a fire, and he will be warm for a night. Set a man on fire, and he will be warm for the rest of his life.
User avatar
madbunny
 
Joined: 17 Jun 2003

Postby Lyrs » Wed Oct 11, 2006 7:23 pm

madbunny wrote:IWhaaaaaah! I want a bigger avatar, that site over there lets us use them! Why can't I have one?
GeneshaSeal - Dead Seals for Free
Orgasm - It's a Science
User avatar
Lyrs
 
Joined: 29 Aug 2002
Location: Internet Donation: 5814 Posts

Postby Orwell » Wed Oct 11, 2006 7:52 pm

madbunny wrote:Stuff


Interesting, let's have a try shall we.

Dear forum administrators/downwithpants,

I've noticed that the average forum user on this forum are very annoying.

I would like to see the banhammer passed out for the following reasons:
a) It would be interesting
b) We might cut back on the people running to the wrong authorities
c) You wouldn't have to do so much
etc...

The people that I think should have this privledge are:
1)Godix
2)Requiett
3)Lyrs/Sarahtheboring/Madbunny [Cycle through these 3, when one doesn't get the right guy another will]
4)Donator Option

I'm sure many users will agree with me, and if its made known as a donator option perhaps it will even enhance the site.

etc... etc... and so on.

Image
Latest
[Kristyrat]: Vote for Orwell
[Kristyrat]: because train conducters are dicks.
Otohiko: whereas Germans are like "god we are all so horrible, we're going to die a pointless death now."
User avatar
Orwell
godx, Son of godix
 
Joined: 06 Jan 2004
Location: Frying Pan. Destination: Fire.

Postby CodeZTM » Wed Oct 11, 2006 8:25 pm

I think that 100*100 would be perfect, and up the file limit to 10kb. I have so many avatars that are around that range. Actually, I don't have a quarell with the size, Ed's typing fingers have actually grown on me.
User avatar
CodeZTM
Spin Me Round
 
Joined: 03 Mar 2006
Location: Arkansas
Status: Flapping Lips

Re: avatars for god's sakes!!

Postby godix » Wed Oct 11, 2006 9:22 pm

salemshady wrote:80 by 80 pixels??!!! common!! 6kb avatars? thats ridiculous!! go to any half decent forums and even they allow for better quality avatars to go with user accounts! a-m-v.org is a major site! thousands of people come by everyday. we need to improve on the avatars that we're allowed to post. period!

Just because other sites allow you to do something does not mean the org should. After all, other sites would allow me to tell you that you're a whining fucking prick who needs to take your mothers cock out of your mouth and shut the fuck up. Those sites would also allow me to express the desire that you get anally raped by a rampaging rhino on viagra, get leprosy and AIDS at the same time, and die a slow miserable death as your skin slowly rots off your still living body. However the org has a no flaming policy so I'm not allowed to say those things to you and most people would probably consider that a good thing.
Image
User avatar
godix
a disturbed member
 
Joined: 03 Aug 2002

Postby godix » Wed Oct 11, 2006 9:26 pm

Incidently, in regards to Orwells comment. I wouldn't want bannination power. That's boring. Give me the power to change usernames, edit peoples sigs, and add that text under their name. That's where the fun is at.
Image
User avatar
godix
a disturbed member
 
Joined: 03 Aug 2002

Postby Lyrs » Wed Oct 11, 2006 10:11 pm

I can see the reasons for everyone else, but you seriously considered Sarah?

lol
GeneshaSeal - Dead Seals for Free
Orgasm - It's a Science
User avatar
Lyrs
 
Joined: 29 Aug 2002
Location: Internet Donation: 5814 Posts

Postby Minion » Thu Oct 12, 2006 12:18 am

godix wrote:add that text under their name. That's where the fun is at.

this seems about right
KioAtWork: I'm so bored. I don't have class again for another half hour.
Minion: masturbate into someones desk and giggle about it for the remaining 28 minutes
User avatar
Minion
 
Joined: 22 May 2004
Location: orlando

PreviousNext

Return to Site Help & Feedback

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests