Quality vs. Compression

This forum is for the general discussion of Anime Music Videos.

Postby Keeper of Hellfire » Fri Aug 05, 2005 4:33 am

Jace101 wrote:With my AMV that I posted on this site is 72MBs (though i zipped it up to 59MBs) and runs for 5 mintues and 5 seconds. Is that too large?


In first attempt, no. Around 15MB/min is acceptable for a high quality AMV. But it depends on many things. With that size it should have screen resolution of 640x480, fast edits and a good number of effects. A hint that in your case could have been done a little more compression is that it zipped that well, assuming you have used a MPEG4 codec. If you compress to the point before the compression gets visual remarkable, the resulting vid is nearly uncompressible for further compressions like zip. This is of course valid too if you cross that point and the vid becomes crap.
User avatar
Keeper of Hellfire
 
Joined: 09 Jan 2005
Location: Germany

Postby Jace101 » Fri Aug 05, 2005 5:52 am

Thanks for the info Keepter of Hellfire.
Jace101
 
Joined: 04 Aug 2005

Postby madbunny » Fri Aug 05, 2005 9:28 am

devilmaykickass wrote:
madbunny wrote:For me file size if irrelevant.

Then why even bother compressing?


Plenty of reasons; storage, playback and compatibility.

I should probably have said that size 'within reason' is irrelevant. I'm not going to be downloading any 4 gig huffyuv files just to watch Naruto go one more round, but on the other hand I have no problem downloading files that are a couple hundred meg if I think real effort went into making the video.

Does that make more sense to you?
Build a man a fire, and he will be warm for a night. Set a man on fire, and he will be warm for the rest of his life.
User avatar
madbunny
 
Joined: 17 Jun 2003

Postby SuperFusion » Fri Aug 05, 2005 10:36 am

To tell you the truth, that sounds like the typical broadband user response. You have the speed to download huge files within seconds, what the hell do you care if the filesize is large even though the compression could've been better. I, as a 56k'er, knows how long it takes to download files that are 70mbs. While you only lose, what, 30 seconds of your life downloading that file? We lose hours. No matter how much effort you put into that AMV, the least you can do is show courtesy to the members who have slow internet connections and make your filesize reasonable. (ie)A 3 minute AMV shouldn't be 60mbs.
SuperFusion
 
Joined: 11 Dec 2003
Location: Miami, FL

Postby Pie Row Maniac » Fri Aug 05, 2005 12:29 pm

Fusion brings up a good point. Broadband use has grown expotentially (ooh big word) but there are still a large amount of dial-up users out there who can't afford broadband, aren't in range and other reasons that don't come to me at this moment. Yet these guys love their AMVs and I'd rather not deny them the oppurtunity to download my videos because I want to be so strict on the video quality. Like I mentioned earlier, I strive to find a moderate balance of the two.
Have a beta? Want some positive criticism? Message me!
User avatar
Pie Row Maniac
 
Joined: 04 Jan 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Status: is not Quo!

Postby madbunny » Fri Aug 05, 2005 1:54 pm

I'm not saying to throw compression out the windows. Sure, I'd love to see HDrez videos, but I can see how that might not happen anytime soon. if you take 10-15 meg per minute as a standard, then a 4 min video is between 40-60 meg depeinding on the source. that's still large by dialup standards, but not unrealistic for a 512x384 sized video. If I can get the same video at 640x480, or even 800x600 for just a few meg more... say... 60-70 meg, then I'd say go for it.

I would rather have an emphasis on quality, and learning how to keep that quality while at the same time learning how to compress than purely on saving file size.

People on dialup that complain endlessly about file size are a lot like people that complain endlessly about the cost of fancy editing programs. Lets face it, you picked a hobby with a high overhead.
Build a man a fire, and he will be warm for a night. Set a man on fire, and he will be warm for the rest of his life.
User avatar
madbunny
 
Joined: 17 Jun 2003

Postby devilmaykickass » Fri Aug 05, 2005 2:13 pm

madbunny wrote:Does that make more sense to you?

Not really.
User avatar
devilmaykickass
 
Joined: 12 May 2003

Postby Keeper of Hellfire » Fri Aug 05, 2005 2:44 pm

madbunny wrote:People on dialup that complain endlessly about file size are a lot like people that complain endlessly about the cost of fancy editing programs.

I have a broadband connection, but as editor I'm interested to find a filesize that is as small as possible while keeping visual quality for two (selfish :twisted: ) reasons. My connection is asymetric, while can download with 1MBit/s I can upload only with 128 kBit/s. Its annoying slow, even if it's 2.5 times the speed that a 56k dial up user has. And the number of dial up users is still large. With keeping the filesize in limits that are interesting for them I increase my audience.

And even if I have a good download speed, as viewer I prefer well compressed files too. My internet contract includes only 1GByte traffic per month. Every additional MByte I have to pay. AMV's aren't my main hobby. This is expensive enough - my motobike.
User avatar
Keeper of Hellfire
 
Joined: 09 Jan 2005
Location: Germany

Postby Sky_William » Fri Aug 12, 2005 11:09 am

If the video looks great, then I'm fine with a large file size. But there is no excuse, if you know how to compress audio, to leave the audio as a pcm wav. When the video and audio are almost the same size, that is just ridiculous. 10-25% percent should be just fine. That will cover the range 128-320Kbps.
User avatar
Sky_William
 
Joined: 09 May 2004

Postby JclassRoleover » Fri Aug 12, 2005 8:19 pm

i always put down to compression 5mb/min. :twisted:
Trapper Mathews
JclassRoleover
 
Joined: 24 Jun 2005

Postby trythil » Sat Aug 13, 2005 6:27 am

madbunny wrote:Sure, I'd love to see HDrez videos, but I can see how that might not happen anytime soon.


Well, the first problem is a lack of anime being broadcast or otherwise distributed in HDTV.

SuperFusion wrote:You have the speed to download huge files within seconds, what the hell do you care if the filesize is large even though the compression could've been better.


Indeed! What the hell do I care? More importantly, what incentive is there for me to care? It's your connection, not mine, and I'm not losing anything vital over your refusal to watch anything I make.

Facetiousness aside, I do think that it is important to maximize compression, if only for personal pride -- but only at minimal cost to video quality. There is no reason why I should have to settle for evident macroblocking and mosquito noise in the final product after having invested so much time getting rid of that junk.

I, as a 56k'er, knows how long it takes to download files that are 70mbs. While you only lose, what, 30 seconds of your life downloading that file? We lose hours.


Is your life so serially structured that you simply cannot do other things while your computer is downloading a large file?

the least you can do is show courtesy to the members who have slow internet connections and make your filesize reasonable. (ie)A 3 minute AMV shouldn't be 60mbs.


This is where we can throw another factor into the quality/size problem.

I'll illustrate by way of anecdote, since it's easiest for me...

I know it is possible to achieve significant size savings with little to no visible degradation in quality by using contemporary video codecs: H.264 implementations, for example, can do quite a number.

The problem is that nobody wants to download the codecs to make this distribution scheme work. Everyone wants to use the same old thing.

So that is the problem. I'd rather not distribute videos that look like crap to anyone, but I'd still like to keep size reasonable. Contemporary compression techniques offer a way to achieve the best of both worlds, but few people have the ability and/or knowledge to play back such material.

Hmm.
This is a block of text that can be added to posts you make. There is a 512 character limit.
trythil
is
 
Joined: 23 Jul 2002
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch

Postby madbunny » Sat Aug 13, 2005 3:12 pm

trythil wrote:
madbunny wrote:Sure, I'd love to see HDrez videos, but I can see how that might not happen anytime soon.


Well, the first problem is a lack of anime being broadcast or otherwise distributed in HDTV.


I thought that most broadcast TV in Japan was either 720p, 1080I, or uh... 1035. For sure that beats 480i any day of the week. So, would I download and watch videos done at 1280x720? Hell yes, ideally they wouldn't suck, but that's never been a guarantee anyway. Correct me if I'm wrong here, but it would seem to me that the problem isn't really the broadcast (which is theoretifcally happening at the higher rez) but that capture devices. I haven't seen many electronics in the 'normal' price range for consumers that can record at the higher resolutions. Thus my theory goes, most of the time the anime is broadcast at either 720, or 1080, and raw providers capture them onto TiVO boxes or something similar at the lower 480 size. Am I even close here?

If I could get 1080i footage, I'd be pretty happy. Sure. I'd prefer that they were compressed to a reasonable amount though. I'll bet you that as the technology for compression (such as the codecs you mention) develop we'll begin to see work put forward in larger and larger file sizes.

I don't know about other people, but when I watch a video that fills the screen with crisp detailed images in it, that makes the video more enjoyable for me. If you take fansubs as an example, they've been getting better and better as the encoding and compression skills of the various groups develop. I think that as a community that specializes in presenting videos to others we should look to presenting them in the best possible light.
Build a man a fire, and he will be warm for a night. Set a man on fire, and he will be warm for the rest of his life.
User avatar
madbunny
 
Joined: 17 Jun 2003

Postby trythil » Sat Aug 13, 2005 4:10 pm

madbunny wrote:
trythil wrote:
madbunny wrote:Sure, I'd love to see HDrez videos, but I can see how that might not happen anytime soon.


Well, the first problem is a lack of anime being broadcast or otherwise distributed in HDTV.


I thought that most broadcast TV in Japan was either 720p, 1080I, or uh... 1035. For sure that beats 480i any day of the week. So, would I download and watch videos done at 1280x720? Hell yes, ideally they wouldn't suck, but that's never been a guarantee anyway.


Japan, yes, but as most people get their source domestically (and don't live in Japan) I figured it was safe to say. If you can intercept HDTV feeds from Japan and get them looking good, well, more power to you.

As far "beating 480i": Resolution-wise, that's true, but you also have to be careful of other things, like errors and bitrate.

Correct me if I'm wrong here, but it would seem to me that the problem isn't really the broadcast (which is theoretifcally happening at the higher rez) but that capture devices. I haven't seen many electronics in the 'normal' price range for consumers that can record at the higher resolutions. Thus my theory goes, most of the time the anime is broadcast at either 720, or 1080, and raw providers capture them onto TiVO boxes or something similar at the lower 480 size. Am I even close here?


No, there do exist readily available capture devices that will handle 720p/1080i HDTV. Check out the WinTV-HD, for instance. If you're into set-top box hacking you may be able to extract MPEG-2 data off of, say, the PVR that digital cable companies will give you. (Don't ask me how to do it...)
This is a block of text that can be added to posts you make. There is a 512 character limit.
trythil
is
 
Joined: 23 Jul 2002
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch

Postby Zero1 » Sat Aug 13, 2005 4:41 pm

Fansubbing could play a substantial role into moving on to H264. The problem is Joe Average is just as content to carry on downloading AVI videos with MPEG-4 ASP.

A disturbing movement I have noticed is that a lot of fansub groups that have taken up H264 are using MKV, while this is of course better than AVI for a number of reasons, the proper way to do this is MP4. As trythil said:
Indeed! What the hell do I care? More importantly, what incentive is there for me to care? It's your connection, not mine, and I'm not losing anything vital over your refusal to watch anything I make.


This is how I feel, I'd rather do a job properly than give way to people. Fansubbing is something we do for fun, we have no obligations. If people really want to see something, they will follow a simple step by step guide to install ~2MB software.

And if the computer isn't fast enough to play it back? I provide alternatives and prompts for updating drivers, directx etc, but other than that it's too bad. Things move on over time, Microsoft aren't making the next version of Windows so that it will run on hardware from 1995.

Like trythil I enjoy what I do and will aim for the best. I have a tendancy to push things to the edge and will often try things that people might shy away from (Still waiting for CQM support in libavcodec!).
User avatar
Zero1
 
Joined: 02 Jan 2004
Location: Sheffield, United Kingdom

Postby trythil » Sat Aug 13, 2005 4:56 pm

Z3r01 wrote: As trythil said:
Indeed! What the hell do I care? More importantly, what incentive is there for me to care? It's your connection, not mine, and I'm not losing anything vital over your refusal to watch anything I make.



Well, I meant that in jest, but I suppose there's some truth in it.
This is a block of text that can be added to posts you make. There is a 512 character limit.
trythil
is
 
Joined: 23 Jul 2002
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch

Previous

Return to General AMV

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests