Considering getting a Mac

This forum is for help with and discussion about your video hardware.

Postby mantlepicture » Wed Jan 19, 2005 7:41 am

Macs are definitely the king of video editing. Macs can do everything a PC can do, and they do it easier and more reliably. As someone who has worked with Avid Xpress Pro on a $7k PC and a $1.5k Mac, I would pick the Mac anyday. I'm not some Windows hater(I am typing this on a Windows XP system), Macs are just the best bet. It's true that most professionals work on Windows, but there is a reason for this. They work for post-production houses, and the editors are very rarely put in charge of purchases. Moronic managment makes those decisions. But I and any other professional editor(someone who edits for a living) can tell you that we prefer Macs.

If you buy a PowerMac G5, get the cheapest one. The processors aren't a big deal. Spend $50 to upgrade the graphics, and spend $300 to get a gig of RAM. DO NOT buy a display through the site. They are sexy, but $1000 is just insane. A third party monitor will work just fine; you can buy two flat screen monitors and still save $400. You will be able to get a great system for about $1800, without a monitor(you can just use the one from your PC if you want). Don't worry about the dual processor systems. They are nice, but they are overkill. In school I use a 1.6Gig single processor, and it is incredibly powerful. The cheapest on the Apple site is 1.8 single. So you don't need to spend a fortune. Just don't be cheap on the RAM. 1GB minimum. You can get away with the stock graphics card, but I recommend at least the 9600(only $50 more).

Like someone else said, try for the student discount. Speaking of student discounts, Studica.com sells Avid Xpress Pro(the best editing program you can get outside of a post-production house) for $300. It's a hard program, but if you used FCP, you will have no problem with it. Or hell, just stick with FCP is that's what you like. It's not as good, but the differences are pretty small.

AbsoluteDestiny wrote:THe main thing avisynth does is frameserve footage (such as dvd mpeg2) into editing programs and make it useable. All mac editing software will work with DV which is lossy and takes up a much more space and with only 40 gig to play with that means not a great deal of video footage.


One thing professional editors do to save drive space is edit in low quality. I can fit at least 30 hours on an 80GB hard drive. Then, when you are done with the editing, simply bump it up to high-res. You don't need high-res footage to make your sequence. You just recapture it after you are done(of course, this only applies if the footage has timecode).

I've been looking heavily into getting a Mac in these last few weeks and reading nonstop, so if you have any questions, I probably know the answer to it, so ask away.
mantlepicture
 
Joined: 06 Apr 2002

Postby mantlepicture » Wed Jan 19, 2005 7:57 am

obh04 wrote:I just got a new iMac G5 a few months ago, and I love it. I have done some editing on it and it is handling just fine. I have the 20 inch widescreen with 160 GB drive, and 512 MB DDR RAM. I also got Final Cut Express 2.
But, what I have is fine, it has done everything I wanted it to do.
If you want to do more then just AMV I would suggest the 250GB drive, and at least 1 GB of RAM.

Or

You can just pay more and, have enough housepower for everything, get the G5 Power Mac.

I hope I have helped you some.

http://www.apple.com/store/


I would recommend not getting a iMac. They are just powerful enough to edit now, but with all the stuff coming in the next 6 months, it will soon be obsolete. Seriously, my instructor at school, an Apple certified employee, said this. It will still be usable, but if you have the choise, go with a PowerMac. The cheapest one is all you need, and you can get it for like $1200 with a student discount.

As for the hard drive, 250 is definitely nice, but not necessary. You can easily get away with 80GB. Here are some tips:

-Do not render. Get a program like Avid Xpress Pro which plays effects in real time. You only have to render one time per project.

-Yes, one time per project. When you are done, set in and out points on the top blank video track, covering all your renders on the below tracks. Drag the effect Submaster(it does nothing, which is the point). When you render this effect, since it's on top of the other renders, it will automatically render everything beneath.

Everytime you render something, you create a media file on your system. Removing it does not delete the file. And rendering each effect, as opposed to using the submaster method, creates a lot of unnecessary files. This is what eats up your hard drive space.

-Delete all media files you are done with. Keep the clips. You can recapture the footage easily, and the clips basically act as shortcuts, so your project will remain intact. A clip is only a few kilobytes, while media files take up gigs.

-Capture all the footage in low quality. Edit with it. When you are done, bump it up to high quality. This way, you are only capturing the footage you need for the edit. On an 80GB drive, you can hold about 30 hours of footage. Since the sequence is your actual project, the low quality media is just a place holder. WARNING: Do not attempt this with any captured footage. Stuff with timecode ONLY(i.e. DVDs).

250GB drives are definitely nice, but get it seperately. You want all your media on a seperate drive from the OS, so the 80GB drive that ships with G5 is perfect. Get a seperate 160GB drive and you will be fine. 250 is only necessary if you like working on MANY long projects at the same time. Again, not a bad idea, but if you are under a budget, it can be cut easily.
mantlepicture
 
Joined: 06 Apr 2002

Postby Kalium » Wed Jan 19, 2005 8:24 am

mantlepicture wrote:Macs are definitely the king of video editing. Macs can do everything a PC can do, and they do it easier and more reliably.

Um... Wow. You really have an advanced case of what I like to call 'Apple Fanboyism'.

I work with Macs, and I know their shortcomings quite well. For one thing, strange and unexplained hardware failures are not all that uncommon - and there's not a damn thing you as the user can do about it. Yes, the OS is good. But the OS isn't everything.

AVISynth is a very powerful tool. If you would stop advertising for Avid for a moment, you could realize why we like it - it's fast, Free, powerful, and oh so flexible.

Oh, and don't forget that using a Mac severly cripples your choice of software tools in general.
User avatar
Kalium
Sir Bugsalot
 
Joined: 03 Oct 2003
Location: Plymouth, Michigan

Postby mantlepicture » Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:51 pm

Kalium wrote:Um... Wow. You really have an advanced case of what I like to call 'Apple Fanboyism'.

I work with Macs, and I know their shortcomings quite well. For one thing, strange and unexplained hardware failures are not all that uncommon - and there's not a damn thing you as the user can do about it. Yes, the OS is good. But the OS isn't everything.

AVISynth is a very powerful tool. If you would stop advertising for Avid for a moment, you could realize why we like it - it's fast, Free, powerful, and oh so flexible.

Oh, and don't forget that using a Mac severly cripples your choice of software tools in general.


No, it's called "extensive use of both platforms". I loved PCs and was even in the middle of building an editing PC until I started using a Mac. Judging by other editors I know in the industly, I am not at all alone on this. Windows has its strong points, but editing isn't one of them.

As for AVS... oh well. I've never ran into a situation where I needed it, and I've done much more advanced things than AMVs. It may be free, but that doesn't mean its manditory.

As for software tools, I disagree. They may have less, but all the best editing software is on the Mac. Even multi-platform software like Avid runs better on Mac. Try getting LiveType or Bryce on your PC. You may say, "well, I don't need those programs". No, but a lot of editors swear by them. Hell, even free programs like GarageBand make it worth it. There is much more to editing than what AVS can do. And there is MUCH more involved with editing than you experience in making a simple AMV. And Macs simply have more to offer a serious editor. Call me a fanboy all you want, but as I've said: I've used a $7k PC and a $1.5k Mac. The Mac has only crashed once for me, while I've see more blue working with Windows than a Smurf. AMVs don't really push the limit of your system like advanced editing does. While many PCs are viable, to get a combination on par with a Mac, you will be spending about $500 more. And you miss out on many amazing programs(you'll never know how much you need LiveType until you use it).

That said, I have nothing against PCs. For general use, I prefer them. Hell, I am on one right now. And while I am buying that Mac, I am also upgrading this PC. In fact, I was one of the biggest anti-Mac people before I started working on a G5. It illiminated pretty much all of the headaches I witnessed on the PC. I was working on a commercial and suddendly got the blue screen of death. I am very good with Windows troubleshooting(God knows I've had my practice...), but I have no idea what happened. I did nothing differently that day than I ever did. Hell, I was only looking through a menu when it happened. And no, it wasn't anything malicious, seeing as that computer never had an internet connection. It must have been some system file, because I ended up having to reinstall Windows. Needless to say, this isn't something you want to do when you have a deadline. I only thank God that I wasn't working with a client. That would have been REALLY embarrassing. While this may be an extreme case, Windows just isn't a stable OS.

The worst a Mac did was lock up one time. I lost nothing, and it set me back all of two minutes.
mantlepicture
 
Joined: 06 Apr 2002

Postby Corran » Wed Jan 19, 2005 3:06 pm

mantlepicture wrote:As for AVS... oh well. I've never ran into a situation where I needed it, and I've done much more advanced things than AMVs. It may be free, but that doesn't mean its manditory.

As for software tools, I disagree. They may have less, but all the best editing software is on the Mac. Even multi-platform software like Avid runs better on Mac. Try getting LiveType or Bryce on your PC. You may say, "well, I don't need those programs". No, but a lot of editors swear by them. Hell, even free programs like GarageBand make it worth it.


Such irony...

Also, it appears you haven't made an amv before so how can I honestly believe you when you say stuff like:
mantlepicture wrote:AMVs don't really push the limit of your system like advanced editing does.
User avatar
Corran
 
Joined: 14 Oct 2002

Postby Kai Stromler » Wed Jan 19, 2005 3:39 pm

mantlepicture wrote: While many PCs are viable, to get a combination on par with a Mac, you will be spending about $500 more.



uh........I call bullshit. I was reading some of your earlier inflammatory posts about enhanced Mac reliability (made possible solely through strict hardware QC and, recently, leveraging of 20+ years of work by the BSD folks), and just for shits and giggles I decided to see what kind of system I could build today for the $700 I put into my last editing station. Shopping only from NewEgg, not only did I get in under budget (this was a headless system using a KVM), but I was able to significantly trade up on the processor (from Athlon XP to Athlon 64, same rating). Mini-Macs aside, Apple doesn't even OFFER a system in this price range, let alone $500 cheaper.

There are some objections to this; nothing has yet been mentioned about the Windows tax, or other software, or the fact that there are no labor costs figured in since the end-user would have to do all the assembly.

The first is easily settled: nobody has to pay the Windows tax any more. Linux may not be 100% "there" yet, wherever the hell "there" is, but there is a significant minority of editors around here who do use it for their work, and it seems to come out just fine. Another option is to use the student exemption that you cited in getting reasonable prices on Avid; if you belong to the engineering department at the right school, as I did, you may have the option of getting the Microsoft OS of your choice for free.

As for the second: other people probably won't be able to get Magix for $13, like I did, but $50, as posted above, is more than reasonable. If, as you say, AMV isn't as demanding as professional editing, there's no need to spend 6x as much on a professional-quality editing suite that additionally hogs a USB port. :)

Finally, the last reason is a valid concern, but is the #1 reason that tech people came to prefer x86/x86-64 architechtures. If you know what you're doing, you can buy high-quality parts and build your own box yourself, saving huge on labor costs. So has it been, so shall it be, at least as long as Apple remains a hardware company.

If you'd kindly post the specs of what you consider to be an optimal Mac editing setup, I'm sure that someone here could assemble a comparable x86/x86-64 system for comparable or lesser cost.

--K
Shin Hatsubai is a Premiere-free studio. Insomni-Ack is habitually worthless.
Death... is Just The Beginning | so essentially it works like bacon
Coelem - Tenebral Presence single now freely available
User avatar
Kai Stromler
 
Joined: 12 Jul 2002
Location: back in the USSA

Postby mantlepicture » Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:09 pm

Corran wrote:Such irony...

Also, it appears you haven't made an amv before so how can I honestly believe you when you say stuff like:
mantlepicture wrote:AMVs don't really push the limit of your system like advanced editing does.


Because I've done things that have pushed my system, such as 3D rendering, advanced effects, etc. Tell me, when is the last time you made a video that used 19 video tracks with nesting?

Now, keep in mind that I am talking about the average AMV. There are a few that were insane, such as VicBond007's Kanon AMV. Your typical AMV consists of cuts and dissolves, and maybe two or three video tracks. If you think that pushes your system, you may want to invest in a new computer. Apply a 30 second blur effect to a piece of footage, then tell me that AMVs push the limit.
mantlepicture
 
Joined: 06 Apr 2002

Postby Corran » Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:20 pm

mantlepicture wrote:Tell me, when is the last time you made a video that used 19 video tracks with nesting?


My DDR video that I made in September. :?


While it is true that most of videos are simple isn't grounds for basing all amvs. There a lot on the site that expoit video software's features to produce complex videos.

To name a few:

http://www.animemusicvideos.org/members ... hp?v=37701
http://www.animemusicvideos.org/members ... hp?v=49915
http://www.animemusicvideos.org/members ... hp?v=47463
User avatar
Corran
 
Joined: 14 Oct 2002

Postby Corran » Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:36 pm

Also.... Why preach about such advanced editing programs here if you feel this way about average amvs?
User avatar
Corran
 
Joined: 14 Oct 2002

Postby obh04 » Thu Jan 20, 2005 5:17 pm

mantlepicture, why would you call the iMac G5 obsolete? If the iMac was to become obsolete wouldn't the PowerMac be, too? They both are G5. So what is so powerful coming out in 6 months that will make it obsolete? My iMac has been fine for me and my editing. Yes I do not do very flashly videos but it is still good.
I was just wondering.
User avatar
obh04
 
Joined: 11 Aug 2003
Location: E.S. of Va

Previous

Return to Video Hardware Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests