dwchang wrote: OK so you have a temporal disorder AND ADD. *YOU* accused me of bringing this up first when in fact you did...
dwchang wrote:No, I was making the point that if a 2.0 Ghz part can beat it in some benchmarks and is comprable in others one can make the logical assumption (as Klinky did) that since a 2.0 Ghz solution can do so well, it must be more efficient *and* a 5.0 Ghz solution would be amazing
dwchang wrote:Mhz to Mhz, the Athlon solution is much more efficient and cost-effective.
dwchang wrote:I guess it was too much for me to assume you'd have half a brain and could actually formulate such obviously apparent theories with such things as logic and reason.
dwchang wrote:I was also making the point that you're basically saying "OMG if you have this really rare and almost impossible-to-get-for-consumers part, it pwns normal things! OMG I AM SO COOL AND SMART!"
dwchang wrote:Says who? Do you know anything about transistor theory? Have you ever designed a processor or understand the intricacies of one? Are you an expert in this field or a designer on such teams? Have you even looked at the roadmaps?
dwchang wrote:http://www.animemusicvideos.org/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=28010&start=20
Looks pretty owned to me. He destroys your statement by questioning your ability to read and then furthers the argument against you which you later do not retort.
the Black Monarch = Daniel Wang ????
dwchang wrote:the Black Monarch wrote:But will in one or two years.
Says who? Do you know anything about transistor theory? Have you ever designed a processor or understand the intricacies of one? Are you an expert in this field or a designer on such teams?
I'm guessing the answer is no to all of these questions. One year? Ha! Have you even looked at the roadmaps? Stop trying to look like you know what you're talking about.
the Black Monarch wrote:dwchang wrote:And if the Athlon needed to be at 3.5 Ghz to perform well then...A) why are hundreds of thousands of people buying them and B) why do benchmarks and well anyone in the industry disagreeing with you. Maybe because you're wrong.
Or maybe because I didn't say just "perform well," I said "perform as well as the P4 that got overclocked to 5.25 GHz"
And if you can point me to a non-overclocked Opteron that can beat a 5.25ghz P4, I'd REALLY like to hear about it.
Again, grumble grumble bitch bitch and the like.jonmartensen wrote:So you want a test where a non-overclocked AMD processor performs better than a highly overclocked Intel processor?the Black Monarch wrote:Not just highly overclocked, but THE most overclocked Intel chip EVER.
madmag9999 wrote:now if memory serves me right there is a law that states that the speed of transisters or something dubles every two years so monarch might be correct. i dont remember the details on it maybe u do dw or maybe when dvirusis dad gets home he will know.
Corran Productions wrote:madmag9999 wrote:now if memory serves me right there is a law that states that the speed of transisters or something dubles every two years so monarch might be correct. i dont remember the details on it maybe u do dw or maybe when dvirusis dad gets home he will know.
It is called Moore's Law but it is hardly a law. It is more of a trend observed by a guy named Gordan Moore (a co-founder of Intel). The press nicknamed it a 'law' and it just stuck. It has no true indication of the future of processor development, it's just an estimate.
madmag9999 wrote: now if memory serves me right there is a law that states that the speed of transisters or something dubles every two years so monarch might be correct. i dont remember the details on it maybe u do dw or maybe when dvirusis dad gets home he will know.
madmag9999 wrote:now that sir is just plain retarded why in the world would u want to run a test with a rediculesly overclocked p4 against a non overclocked amd?
madmag9999 wrote:now this next coment might sound a little stupid but iv been wondering since pure H2O dose not conduct electricity and if a computer was made of plaistic/silicon and had a water proof case couldnt you technicly fill it with water then run 2 pumps in the case one sucking the water out and one pushing it in and then cool the water outside the case to just above freezing point this would be a fairly good way to cool something wouldnt it? not quite as expensive as liquid nitrogen
madmag9999 wrote:jonmartensen wrote:So you want a test where a non-overclocked AMD processor performs better than a highly overclocked Intel processor?the Black Monarch wrote:Not just highly overclocked, but THE most overclocked Intel chip EVER.
dwchang wrote:the best part about the overcloekd 5 Ghz P4 is that...an Opteron still beat it on *some* benchmarks
the Black Monarch wrote:dwchang wrote:the best part about the overcloekd 5 Ghz P4 is that...an Opteron still beat it on *some* benchmarks
That came before anyone else said anything about comparing a non-overclocked chip to an overclocked one. Proof to both of you that HE STARTED THIS RIDICULOUS BULLSHIT ABOUT A 2.0GHZ OPTERON VERSUS A 5.25 GHZ PENTIUM 4.
Return to Video Hardware Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests