Video card wouldn't have any impact on compressing, or well anything to do with video editing either
klinky wrote:Maybe if your tests were more scientific :p. But I think it's rather obvious that a 1.4Ghz CPU is going to lose out to a 2.4Ghz CPU, even if it's a Pentium4 2.4Ghz.
Video card wouldn't have any impact on compressing, or well anything to do with video editing either
dwchang wrote:klinky wrote:As for the statement about never buying a MAC, you should keep in mind that the best editing software is on Apples and NOT PCs
alternatefutures wrote:Nope, Avid XPress Pro is on both, ditto with Media Composer (if you want best-of-the-best). If you're looking for bang for your buck, then Vegas is only on Windows.
Edo wrote:Since my last post I've noticed you guys mistakenly didn't read my whole post. IF U READ CAREFULLY!!!! I said a "DUAL 1.4GHZ" Mac system over my 2.4GHz P4, that means the MAC had a 400 MHz increase over min and still lost by half!
Edo wrote:I must state again! the MAC CPU's "ARE" slower than PC type CPU's! ie. Pentium and Athlons, If you don't belive me check out some stats on google.com. MAC's are good but there is way too much hype. Remember the only reason why MAC's are fast is because of the OS configuration and programing andnot the CPU or BUS.
dwchang wrote:the Black Monarch wrote:Since this is a powerbook-oriented thread, what are your thoughts on Apple chips?
They're slow...?
the Black Monarch wrote:dwchang wrote:the Black Monarch wrote:Since this is a powerbook-oriented thread, what are your thoughts on Apple chips?
They're slow...?
Once again, dw has blown us all away with amazing technical detail.
Edo wrote:Okay your right to an extent, none the less PC would still be better than a MAC as for you saying it's not all software. I'm afraid your wrong. I've taken classes in computer enginering and electronic design for 3 years now, I know how and what goes throught the CPU and what not.
Return to Video Hardware Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests