MycathatesyouAMV wrote:Any update on the status of my video in question ?
This program contains some material that many parents would find unsuitable for children under 14 years of age. Parents are strongly urged to exercise greater care in monitoring this program and are cautioned against letting children under the age of 14 watch unattended. This program may contain one or more of the following: intensely suggestive dialogue (D), strong coarse language (L), intense sexual situations (S), or intense violence (V)?
This program contains material that parents may find unsuitable for younger children. Many parents may want to watch it with their younger children. The theme itself may call for parental guidance and/or the program may contain one or more of the following: some suggestive dialogue (D), infrequent coarse language (L), some sexual situations (S), or moderate violence (V)?
XStylus wrote:ProjectBarcodeError wrote:haven't got any mail for my password in order to log and send my dl links.![]()
Any optionnal way ?
Send an email to us and we'll re-send your login info.
XStylus wrote:Tsu! wrote:Vlad G Pohnert wrote:Just over 10 days left! Still need more videos so keep them coming.?
*goes back to thwacking Avatar Music Video with wrench*
Ya' should use the right tool for the right job. [hands Tsu a hammer]
MaboroshiStudio wrote:I just got the email and I got to ask.?? when is PG-13 actually PG-13? lol.??
Every con I have submitted to PG-13 doesn't mean PG-13 imho and the rating is ultra subjective. Seems to me when in doubt in regards to skin / sexual situations the rating is elevated and when it comes to violence it is like nobody cares like there are two rating systems being used. Remember Attack on Titan is TV-MA.?? which has an age restriction of 17.?? if cons are going to use rating system then at least be accurate / true to them otherwise get rid of them. Then again as I am running a Avatar Music Video contest now I know at the end of the day the powers that be can overrule me.?? but I have pointed out to them / had long discussions if we are going to use the rating system as our guide we don't make crap up.
I suggest cons switch to the TV system.?? TV-14 is much more descriptive than the nebulous PG-13 rating description which I wonder was last updated. After much discussion for MTAC I got them to switch from PG-13 to TV-14This program contains some material that many parents would find unsuitable for children under 14 years of age. Parents are strongly urged to exercise greater care in monitoring this program and are cautioned against letting children under the age of 14 watch unattended. This program may contain one or more of the following: intensely suggestive dialogue (D), strong coarse language (L), intense sexual situations (S), or intense violence (V)?
Look at TV-PG which sounds like PG-13 to be honest.??This program contains material that parents may find unsuitable for younger children. Many parents may want to watch it with their younger children. The theme itself may call for parental guidance and/or the program may contain one or more of the following: some suggestive dialogue (D), infrequent coarse language (L), some sexual situations (S), or moderate violence (V)?
Sorry to vent.?? I have had multiple long discussions with my con about this subject
MaboroshiStudio wrote:I just got the email and I got to ask.?? when is PG-13 actually PG-13? lol.??
Every con I have submitted to PG-13 doesn't mean PG-13 imho and the rating is ultra subjective. Seems to me when in doubt in regards to skin / sexual situations the rating is elevated and when it comes to violence it is like nobody cares like there are two rating systems being used. Remember Attack on Titan is TV-MA.?? which has an age restriction of 17.?? if cons are going to use rating system then at least be accurate / true to them otherwise get rid of them. Then again as I am running a Avatar Music Video contest now I know at the end of the day the powers that be can overrule me.?? but I have pointed out to them / had long discussions if we are going to use the rating system as our guide we don't make crap up.
I suggest cons switch to the TV system.?? TV-14 is much more descriptive than the nebulous PG-13 rating description which I wonder was last updated. After much discussion for MTAC I got them to switch from PG-13 to TV-14This program contains some material that many parents would find unsuitable for children under 14 years of age. Parents are strongly urged to exercise greater care in monitoring this program and are cautioned against letting children under the age of 14 watch unattended. This program may contain one or more of the following: intensely suggestive dialogue (D), strong coarse language (L), intense sexual situations (S), or intense violence (V)?
Look at TV-PG which sounds like PG-13 to be honest.??This program contains material that parents may find unsuitable for younger children. Many parents may want to watch it with their younger children. The theme itself may call for parental guidance and/or the program may contain one or more of the following: some suggestive dialogue (D), infrequent coarse language (L), some sexual situations (S), or moderate violence (V)?
Sorry to vent.?? I have had multiple long discussions with my con about this subject

Ileia wrote:Quoted Image converted to link:
http://i.imgur.com/onob2zR.jpg
I'm sorry to bother you.??.but.??.um.??.I was wondering if maybe.?.there was a finalist list yet?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests