

Radical_Yue wrote:Kimberly wrote:I didn't lower a certain video's score just because I thought the effects were cheesy and ugly. Plus, I wasn't saying that about the original, because as it's already been mentioned, I'm not supposed to judge videos on that. Therefore, I thought the REMAKE's effects were cheesy and ugly. As I said before, the panel says, "Comments", not "Critique"? I can post my thoughts however I want and if people don't like it, then sucks.
Just saying it again, I didn't lower my score on that video because I thought it was ugly. Infact, if you read my comment thoroughly, I said the effects were done well.
And I didn't realize that these days, opinions can't differ. If some people don't like what I consider my favorite video, I'll accept it.Radical_Yue wrote:
A judge is supposed to be picked for their eye and ability to critique videos with set criteria, not for their personal opinions.
Aw, I heart you too.![]()
I honestly think the problem that we're having is that all the entrants go to the comments section expecting to read the reasoning behind scores and not personal opinions. This isn't a personal attack by the way, I think it's honestly a simple misunderstanding that is causing confusion.
EDIT: When someone uses the comments to say "I did not enjoy this video" even if it isn't being brought into the scoring, it really looks that way and that looks bad on the person who left that comment unless they clarify the fact that it is indeed their personal opinion but they scored x, y, & z because yadda yadda yadda.
Nya-chan Production wrote:If I go by that reasoning, I can as well just rate the technical aspect and leave Overall (which I use for the overall liking of the video, like some other judge mentioned) on 20 by default, because after all, there will always be someone who will super-duper like it and I should see it from their point of view.
I mean, I really thought that out of 100 people about 30 COULD like this video, even though I really disliked it personally. I am mistaken, it seems. (It's more like 50/50, btw, from the response of crowd and judges.) Should I take on a course of crowd and personal psychology to better predict how many people will like an AMV and be more objective?
If I overdo the example - if a video is technically epic and awesome, yet the imagery and the video itself makes me literally vomit.?? should I give the video 20 because there are people who like to vomit while watching videos (and/or just like the video that much that it deserves a 20 to them)?
OtakuGray wrote:Sometimes anime can branch out to a younger audience and this is one of those times where you wish children would just go die.
Stirspeare wrote:<Stirspeare> Lopez: Vanquish my virginity and flood me with kit. ["Ladies.??"]



Kisanzi wrote:Yay for a small break before the last round to recharge my batteries. Thank you Code!
@everyone in thread: Points have been made by both sides, let's just get back to enjoying what we do here again please?
@chiiisus: Thanks for posting your honest thoughts, it only makes me want to pull out all the stops for the last round even more. Granted, I've already been editing myself sick for a couple of the rounds. >?< But I'm having fun, so totally worth it.
Just to clarify, I wasn't complaining earlier just voicing my thoughts. I appreciate everything that Code, the judges, and my fellow contestants have done for the contest thus far. I have greatly enjoyed my time in the orgeditor contests thus far and have to give props to everybody for keeping with it and giving me a reason to get off my ass and actually edit.
AimoAio wrote:You've made pretty solid stuff for all of the rounds so I know you can edit well in a week, don't let this dishearten you in joining future OrgEditor contests.
Animated wrote:Late response to everything written above.?? all of my anger has already vanished and I can clearly aknowledge my video as a cheap effort to make a shocking parody vid, after all, there were many better examples of parodies in the past, even in POE times.

SilverFreedoms wrote:Animated wrote:Late response to everything written above.?? all of my anger has already vanished and I can clearly aknowledge my video as a cheap effort to make a shocking parody vid, after all, there were many better examples of parodies in the past, even in POE times.
Oh come on now.
No need to cut down your own video. =(
OtakuGray wrote:Sometimes anime can branch out to a younger audience and this is one of those times where you wish children would just go die.
Stirspeare wrote:<Stirspeare> Lopez: Vanquish my virginity and flood me with kit. ["Ladies.??"]

Kitsuner wrote:SilverFreedoms wrote:Animated wrote:Late response to everything written above.?? all of my anger has already vanished and I can clearly aknowledge my video as a cheap effort to make a shocking parody vid, after all, there were many better examples of parodies in the past, even in POE times.
Oh come on now.
No need to cut down your own video. =(
Yeah, plenty of other people are already doing that for you. Now it's all mainstream.

Return to Project OrgEditor Season 3: The King of Spring
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests