BasharOfTheAges wrote:I can't even make sense of your incoherent rambling.
...
There are things collectively understood to be marks of quality - if there were not, you wouldn't have people going to school to learn about and obtain degrees in artistic fields. There would be nothing to teach.
Ikore wrote:Good is a matter of perception.
Ikore wrote:BasharOfTheAges wrote:I can't even make sense of your incoherent rambling.
...
There are things collectively understood to be marks of quality - if there were not, you wouldn't have people going to school to learn about and obtain degrees in artistic fields. There would be nothing to teach.Ikore wrote:Good is a matter of perception., if Im wrong, I should consider good what the rest of the world tell me so.
Great linkEmong wrote:The discussion above reminds me of something quite vulgar but interesting: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PktUzdnBqWI
but I am, it's my mind and it's supposed of me to be master of my likes. even if it is genetically predisposed, or the art "science" states it to be beautiful, if everyone would like the same stuff, it would be boring and the advertising industry would be over too.Phantasmagoriat wrote:You are not just some omnipotent all-knowing viewer, judge, and jury of what is considered 'Good,'.
yeah it was pretty interesting.Phantasmagoriat wrote:Also,Great linkEmong wrote:The discussion above reminds me of something quite vulgar but interesting: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PktUzdnBqWI
The best artists keep doing what they feel is right, true and fulfilling.
x noticeable -ejem ejem....Ikore wrote:notorious.
Phantasmagoriat wrote:But have you never wondered WHY you think something is good? I mean, if something is good... sure you can say you 'know' it's good, but it's 'goodness' is based on something.
I think that depends on what the artist was trying to achieve in the first place. If they want to make something, say, and AMV, for the purpose of satisfying an itch, then their art accomplishes what they want. If they want to make other people happy; or spread a message and connect with their audience, then the art isn't so much about the artist anymore. Now if the artist doesn't know what they are trying to achieve in the end... well then therein lies a big problem... especially when they run into failure. Because often, an artist just wants their work to be successful; but that's probably the worst reason for making anything. Of course, it get's more complicated when you consider some artists make their art for a living. However, I'll leave you with one of my favourite quotes:Ikore wrote:and then the question, arts are meant to satisfy the audience or the artist?. is it enough for an artist to people find his work acceptable?
Yeah, I actually do that too.Arigatomina wrote:That's why I have two definitions of good when it comes to amvs
that one goes to facebook.Phantasmagoriat wrote:"Success is not to be pursued; it is to be attracted by the person you become." - Jim Rohn
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest