Nya-chan Production wrote:Best First Video (56)
Riddy - Jealous Love (37)
EllipseIris - Eat Me Alive (35)
OYES!
Nya-chan Production wrote:Best First Video (56)
Riddy - Jealous Love (37)
EllipseIris - Eat Me Alive (35)

Radical_Yue wrote:Fun times :3
My judges choice would have to go to Artistic Anarchy by Echotrooper. Easily one of my favorite videos of the year

BasharOfTheAges wrote:Rank voting like the kind used here does allow for some interesting voting strategies. You essentially have degrees of up-votes and down-votes or kill votes to take others out of the running with.
BasharOfTheAges wrote:Rank voting like the kind used here does allow for some interesting voting strategies. You essentially have degrees of up-votes and down-votes or kill votes to take others out of the running with.


Nya-chan Production wrote:BasharOfTheAges wrote:Rank voting like the kind used here does allow for some interesting voting strategies. You essentially have degrees of up-votes and down-votes or kill votes to take others out of the running with.
I am open to better ideas~ ^^
I haven't read much about voting strategies, I am afraid, so any idea that's reasonable and would help to make this... interesting, or "more fair" (however you feel that term should be taken wwww) is welcome~
I have already separated the voting sheets because of fear that looking at other's sheets, even unconsciously, can alter your decisions a bit. We're only human after all ^^;;
BasharOfTheAges wrote:Nya-chan Production wrote:BasharOfTheAges wrote:Rank voting like the kind used here does allow for some interesting voting strategies. You essentially have degrees of up-votes and down-votes or kill votes to take others out of the running with.
I am open to better ideas~ ^^
I haven't read much about voting strategies, I am afraid, so any idea that's reasonable and would help to make this... interesting, or "more fair" (however you feel that term should be taken wwww) is welcome~
I have already separated the voting sheets because of fear that looking at other's sheets, even unconsciously, can alter your decisions a bit. We're only human after all ^^;;
it isn't bad perse, so long, of course, as those voting with such a system have the primary motive of participation in an exercise and not one to game the system so that their views are the ones expressed in the end. All boils down to trust in the people judging.
Nya-chan Production wrote:BasharOfTheAges wrote:it isn't bad perse, so long, of course, as those voting with such a system have the primary motive of participation in an exercise and not one to game the system so that their views are the ones expressed in the end. All boils down to trust in the people judging.
Yeah, I am afraid most of the systems are ^^;;
I, as a judge, for example admit that I was totally unphased by PencilHead - it bored me to no end at most parts - and as such it got maybe lower scores at places than it should've gotten. But well, it didn't stop it anyway, which I guess is fine~
Vlad G Pohnert wrote:Well, the only one award I'd be kind of careful in dishing out would be the "Lifetime Achievement award" to only give it out once means it needs to be defined what lifetime really is.
Generally IMO it means someone who has spent a considerable time establishing themselves and has a profound influence in his career. IMO the only persons that are eligible for example would be editors like Godix and Roll the Stampede or possibly editors that where here a long time and pretty much retired. To give to someone still very active and not quite finished when they might even peak a lot more and only given once just does not define the award for me at all..
Hence good choice on Godix (I don’t disagree there), but I would suggest a much more finer stricter evaluation and guidelines for it if you’re going to go with this award.
Vlad
Vlad G Pohnert wrote:Well, the only one award I'd be kind of careful in dishing out would be the "Lifetime Achievement award" to only give it out once means it needs to be defined what lifetime really is.
Generally IMO it means someone who has spent a considerable time establishing themselves and has a profound influence in his career. IMO the only persons that are eligible for example would be editors like Godix and Roll the Stampede or possibly editors that where here a long time and pretty much retired. To give to someone still very active and not quite finished when they might even peak a lot more and only given once just does not define the award for me at all..
Hence good choice on Godix (I don’t disagree there), but I would suggest a much more finer stricter evaluation and guidelines for it if you’re going to go with this award.
Vlad


Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests