


Emong wrote: That's what you get when your legal system is not primarily based on social justice but on the protection of private property.
Otohiko wrote:Emong wrote: That's what you get when your legal system is not primarily based on social justice but on the protection of private property.
Why are those two things mutually exclusive? That's a false opposition and has nothing to do with the matter at hand. Misleading, hyperbole-filled rhetoric doesn't help anybody and just attracts people to causes based on false premises, making them more likely to buy into the false premises that 'social injustice' as such is rooted on.
In my view that sort of thing damages the supposed moral superiority of the protests here. And the notion of Kim Schmitz having moral superiority and being a friend of social justice is kind of...
Otohiko wrote:Emong wrote: That's what you get when your legal system is not primarily based on social justice but on the protection of private property.
Why are those two things mutually exclusive? That's a false opposition and has nothing to do with the matter at hand. Misleading, hyperbole-filled rhetoric doesn't help anybody and just attracts people to causes based on false premises, making them more likely to buy into the false premises that 'social injustice' as such is rooted on.
Emong wrote:We're talking about copyright and intellectual property, which is just another extension to the list of artificial commodities within capitalism. It has everything to do with the matter at hand.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests